Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
8 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving 2 EFTA00792351 women who were seventee
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (Tr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 ('Fr.). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sch
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving 2 EFTA00181039 EFTA00181040 women wh
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (Tr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 (Tr.). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sche
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving 2 EFTA00231549 women who were seventee
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (fr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 ('It). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sche
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving EFTA00232669 women who were seventeen y
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (Tr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 (Tr.). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sche
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (450)
Entities connected to both Appellant and the New York Police Department
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON34 w/ Appellant·89 w/ the
New York
LOCATION15 w/ Appellant·63 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON14 w/ Appellant·58 w/ the
United States
LOCATION15 w/ Appellant·53 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION8 w/ Appellant·60 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·55 w/ the
Donald Trump
PERSON8 w/ Appellant·54 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON23 w/ Appellant·39 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Appellant·50 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Appellant·47 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON8 w/ Appellant·47 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Appellant·43 w/ the
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION8 w/ Appellant·39 w/ the
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·35 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON20 w/ Appellant·21 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON13 w/ Appellant·25 w/ the
Joe Biden
PERSON6 w/ Appellant·31 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Appellant·16 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON8 w/ Appellant·26 w/ the
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Appellant·28 w/ the