Epstein Secrets

iewed as a form of injunctive relief, is more precisely viewed as a pre- judgment seizure of property. In any event, the name is not important. See Rosen v. Cascade Intern., Inc., 21 F.3d 1520, 1530 (11th Cir. 1994) (“federal courts look past the terminology to the actual nature of the relief request

solely upon a privileged refusal to admit or deny at the pleading stage.” Epstein Memo. in Opp. [DE 198 at 10] (quoting LaSalle Bank Lake View v. Seguban, 54 F.3d 387, 391 (7th Cir. 1995) (emphasis added)). As just Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2009 Page 15 of

the plaintiff seeks only to recover money damages do not fall within the jurisdiction of equity and injunctive relief is therefore unavailable. See Rosen v. Cascade Int'!, Inc., 21 F.3d 1520, 1529-30 (11th Cir. 1994) (holding that the district court Jacked the general equitable authority to issue an

ng the relief sought by Jane Doe based solely on an adverse inference would violate Epstein's Fifth Amendment rights. See LaSalle Bank Lake View v. Seguban, 54 F.3d 387, 389 (7th Cir. 1995) (noting that "the Supreme Court has prohibited practices that are coercive in that they make the exercise of the p

the plaintiff seeks only to recover money damages do not fall within the jurisdiction of equity and injunctive relief is therefore unavailable. See Rosen v. Cascade Int'l. Inc. 21 F.3d 1520, 1529-30 (11th Cir. 1994) (holding that the district court lacked the general equitable authority to issue an i

nting the relief sought by Jane Doc based solely on an adverse inference would violate Epstein's Fifth Amendment rights. LaSalle Bank Lake View v. Seguban, 54 F.3d 387, 389 (7th Cir. 1995) (noting that "the Supreme Court has prohibited practices that are coercive in that they make the exercise of the p