Epstein Secrets

ence used to prosecute Epstein for those crimes. Sheldon v. Sheldon, 193 B.R. 152, 162 (S.D.N.Y 1996). To

________ / Defendant's Response In Opposition to Jane Doe 2-8s Motion to Compel Net Worth Discovery, With

0119-KAM Document 522 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/09/2010 Page 12 of 15 link in the chain of evidence used to prosecute Epstein for those crimes. Sheldon v. Sheldon, 193 B.R. 152, 162 (S.D.N.Y 1996). Answers to the interrogatories, on their face, could also provide information showing Epstein's avai

dment privilege must be sustained as it has correctly been applied relative to similar requests throughout this litigation. For example, Plaintiff (Jane Doe) also sought Request for Admissions dealing with Epstein's "financial history," "net worth," "fraudulent conveyances" and "real- estate ownership."

e to the requests would support a conviction or provide a link in the chain of evidence to support a conviction against Epstein. See M•, Sheldon v. Sheldon, 193 B.R. 152, 162 (S.D. N.Y. 1996)(the Court, in camera, determined that answers to certain deposition questions would support a conviction or pro

... travels in foreign commerce". Thus, facially, an essential proof of any allegation of 18 U.S.C. 2422(b) - the statutory precondition alleged by Jane Doe 2 for a 2255 civil damage recovery - includes telephone, cellular phone, e-mail records or other "communications" as a facility of interstate comme

BOOTH,JOAN MYERS,JANE B TOLL,SHELDON S CINQUE,GAY LAKE TRAIL LLC FI

QUINN,OLIVER H LOCKER,NANCY OWEN,JANE D CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD KELLER,MICHAEL

, first hand, both their opponent's version of the matters in dispute and a neutral assessment of the relative strengths of the opposing positions." Sheldon v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Comm'n, 104 F. Supp. 2d 511, 513 (W.D. Pa. 2000). In other words, the parties are allowed to disclose documents and inform

obtained from the U.S. Attorney's Office or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, they were obtained from counsel for Jeffrey Epstein pursuant to Jane Doe # 1 's civil suit against Mr. Epstein, to which the United States was not a party. Thus, the United States has never had the opportunity to litigat

, first hand, both their opponent's version of the matters in dispute and a neutral assessment of the relative strengths of the opposing positions." Sheldon v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Comm'n, 104 F. Supp. 2d 511, 513 (W.D. Pa. 2000). In other words, the parties are allowed to disclose documents and inform

obtained from the U.S. Attorney's Office or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, they were obtained from counsel for Jeffrey Epstein pursuant to Jane Doe # 1 's civil suit against Mr. Epstein, to which the United States was not a party. Thus, the United States has never had the opportunity to litigat