Epstein Secrets

ed to address the Court. I cited the CVRA and other statutes to support the Court's authority to hear from them. The second case was United States.. Oliver, which was the Office's first case seeking the appointment of I guardian ad litem (GAL). Through these cases, I researched statutes, cases, the USA

email from Jeff that said, "Hold the letter" (Exhibit B-54). On December 10, 2007, I contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe'. United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for by Mr. Epstein. I told Mr. Eisenberg that I was

ad been identified in the state investigation), alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The suit, which is still pending, is captioned Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 21 United States, 08-80736-CV-KAM. Page 3 of 58 EFTA00225046 set aside the NPA and see Mr. Epstein federally charged due to violatio

ANCY W NASSAU SQ COOP APTS GRACE JR,OLIVER R NUMBER ONE NORTH FRENEY,CAROLINE

QUINN,OLIVER H LOCKER,NANCY OWEN,JANE D CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD KELLER,MICHAEL

ked to address the Court. I cited the CVRA and other statutes to support the Court's authority to hear from them. The second case was United States' Oliver, which was the Office's first case seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem (GAL). Through these cases, I researched statutes, cases, the USA

of a federal case, but I don't recall discussing that at the time. 35 I had never before used a non-prosecution 34 As I noted in my filings in the Jane Doe' United States litigation, I had concerns about informing the victims that part of the negotiations involved securing for them the right to obtain d

i i by the time I joined it in 1977, people were still talking about the good old Gilmour days. EFTA01682757 _My close friend was his second son, Oliver, who is a conductor, who like his siblings was very close to his parents. In fact, the Gilmour family was a strange one. For England, that is. They

efamatory copycat of the first." There has been a twist in the first Jane Doe lawsuit. Her mother in Georgia contends that her former husband — Jane Doe's father — con- sulted with neither of them before filing the lawsuit. She is asking a judge to halt the litigation until her daughter turns 18 in

. O'Brien, Jr., Kennedy, O'Brien, McCormack & Mulcahey, Christopher J. Osborne, Powell Law, Scranton, PA, Karo- line Mehalchick, Joseph A. O'Brien. Oliver, Price & Rhodes, Clarks Summit, PA, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM CAPUTO, District Judge. Presently before the Court are Defen- dants Diocese of Sc

affirm the judgment of the District Court. John DOE # 1; Kelly Doe # 1, Parents of Jane Doe # 1, Individually and as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 1; John Doe # 2; Kelly Doe # 2, Parents of Jane Doe # 2, as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 2 I William Lawson CHAMBERLIN, Jr.; Kathr