Epstein Secrets

om the prosecutor goes hand-in-hand with the lawyer s additional duty to make suitable inquiry to determine whether valid defenses exist. Jones v. Cunningham, 313 F.2d 347 (4th Cir.1963) ( Of course, it is not for a lawyer to fabricate defenses, but he does have an affirmative obligation to make suitable

w. EFTA00301919 Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice of either undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, thereby creating a self-incriminating record that

om the prosecutor goes hand-in- hand with the lawyer's additional duty to "make suitable inquiry" to determine whether valid defenses exist. Jones'. Cunningham, 313 F.2d 347 (4th Cir.I 963) ("Of course, it is not for a lawyer to fabricate defenses, but he does have an affirmative obligation to make suitable

vance of the law. Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice °feistier undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, "thereby creating a self-incriminating record that m

er multiple times without intervention. FN25. Although Fell summarily al- leges Fifth and Eighth Amendment violations related to the admission of Cunningham's testimony, he of- fers no supporting arguments. "Issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will n be a

vance of the law. Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice of either undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, "thereby creating a self-incriminating record that m