Epstein Secrets

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law - Attorneys for Petitioners a The emergency was based upon petitioners' belief that Jeffrey Epstein was eng

rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it." In Goforth i Owens , 766 F.2d 1533 (11 ih Cir. 1985), the Eleventh Circuit observed that "[a] district court is authorized, on defendant's motion, to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to obey a court order or fe

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Petitioners a The emergency was based u

rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it." In Goforth v. Owens , 766 F.2d 1533 (11 ih Cir. 1985), the Eleventh Circuit observed that "[a] district court is authorized, on defendant's motion, to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to obey a court order or fe

long. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide on this. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law 5.10iiinnev Collene of Law at the University of Utah • nfidential. This message is intended only for the us

tions? Thanks. From: Paul Cassell Se 01408:54 AM To Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: Statute of Limitations Issue Dear When Brad and I argued before the Eleventh Circuit, we raised the issue of a possible expiration of the statute of limitations for prosecuting Epstein. We were concerned that the ten-year statute mig

ks for providing us whatever information you can as soon as you can. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. , Room 101 Salt Lake Ci , UT 84112-0730 (p

cations. Kenneth A. Marra From: Paul Cassell To: . (USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS)" , "Brad Edwards r < Date: 07/01/2013 02:21 PM Subject: RE:MTD in the Eleventh Circuit Hi Brad and I are preparing to file today in the Eleventh Circuit a motion to dismiss Epstein's frivolous interlocutory appeal, for reasons outlin

uit lacks jurisdiction, at this time, over any such appeal. Thanks! Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112

From: Paul Cassell <MIII > To: IS s I. (USAFLS)" Cc: Edwardr, (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Lack of jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:09:35 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: victim-opposition-mts.pdf Hi ands Could you pass along our pleading to whoe

acks jurisdiction, at this time, over any such appeal. Thanks! > Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 > Paul G. Cassell > Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law > S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah > 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 8

Subject: Re: Lack of jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:37:07 +0000 Importance: Normal It has been sent. Thanks. On Jun 28, 2013, at 12:09 PM, "Paul Cassell" <[email protected]

NEY COLLEGE OF LAW THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH March 1, 2011 Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida PAUL G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Re: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. United States, No. 09-80736 Dear Mr. Ferrer: We are writing to you per

ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of

s of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC 2028 Harrison Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 (954) 414-8033 Fax: (954) 924-1530 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. , Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-07

rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it." In Goforth i Owens , 766 F.2d 1533 (11 ih Cir. 1985), the Eleventh Circuit observed that "[a] district court is authorized, on defendant's motion, to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to obey a court order or fe

H March 1, 2011 Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N.E.4th Street Miami, FL 33132 • • PAUL. G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Telephone: 801-585-5202 [email protected] Re: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. United States, No. 09-80

ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of

THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N.E.4th Street Miami, FL 33132 PAUL G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Telephone: September 29, 2011 Re: Follow-up on leffre,y Epstein Dear Mr. Ferrer: As you know, Brad Edwar

ur Office prevails on that Issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of