4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
ng. Our proposal is simply this: that www.law.utah.edu • Main Office (801) 581-6833 • Facsimile (801) 581-6897 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0730 EFTA01712002 • • your Office and Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 would stipulate to a set of facts to provide context-for the Court
ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of
. Our proposal is simply this: that sriveclaw.utah.edu • Main Office (801) 581-6833 • Facsimile (801) 581-6897 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0730 EFTA01688966 •• your Office and Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 would stipulate to a set of facts to provide context-for the Court
ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of
e that something was rotten with the way this case was handled. 1 www.law.utah.edu • Main Office • Facsimile 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0730 EFTA00231604 As you may know, was a senior prosecutor and supervisor in your Office when the non-prosecution agreement with Jef
ur Office prevails on that Issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of
what the victims were proposing. Our proposal is simply this: that www.law.utah.edu • Main Office • Facsimile 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0730 EFTA00232730 your Office and Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 would stipulate to a set of facts to provide context for the Court whil
ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of
Entities connected to both Lake City and the Eleventh Circuit

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONJack Goldberger
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON