Epstein Secrets

- January 21, 1977 December 23, 1986 Pending April 11, 1984 April 14, 1923 June 12, 1902 - June 24, 1935 April 26, 2000 + Considered a Treaty in Force by U.S., but not by Colombia Citation (if any): 47 Stat. 2122 28 UST 5290 32 UST 3111 28 UST 227 32 UST 1310 28 UST 227 TIAS 10850 43 Stat. 1698

on her daughter's behalf and asked that P ; wee te ee mL “| the litigation be halted until her daughter turns 18. - The mother com- plained that Jane Doe’s father’ did not consult with her or their daughter before sting Epstein ‘for $50mil- Epstein lion. The lawsuit al- Accused of leges sexual assault,

ect Name VICT-WITH CODR 10 WANTED FLYR GARS CART ASSET FORF PRO FORF SUPPORT P TFOS/CTD CXS/CTD INFRAGARD/CYD OFC/CID PPP RA squed reek Force PBC P82 SSPBC 1 • Used, but did not help 2 • Helped, Minimally 3 • Helped, Substantially 4 a Absolutely Essential Living/Doccesed: Living Dat

ent federal lawsuit last week, on behalf of the Jane Doe • 101 who allegedly visited Epstein a few times

nal justice process." !° After successfully passing many state constitutional amendments, crime victims' rights advocates sought to achieve the Task Force's broadest recommendation: to secure protection for victims' rights in the U.S. Constitution. In 1996, victims’ advocates proposed a Victims' Rights

cult for victims to discover after the fact that potential criminal charges against a criminal who has abused them have been secretly bargained away. Jane Doe Number One and Jane Doe Number Two, for example, were outraged when they discovered prosecutors had entered into an agreement blocking any prosecutio