Epstein Secrets

the judge need not view the film: no matter what its content, I said, it would be unconstitutional for him to enjoin the showing of any film. If the D.A. thought the film was obscene, he could wait until it was exhibited and then arrest those responsible for its being shown. Judge Alberti insisted, how

efore the scheduled performance, Carl Stork and Nathan J. Hagen—the co- presidents of the Quincy House Film Society—received telephone calls from the D.A.’s office directing them to be in Judge Charles R. Alberti’s courtroom at two o’clock for a hearing. Stork and Hagen tried to call me in my office. Bu

urther petitions. I told him I would be obliged to bring a further petition, if the evidence warranted it. Such new evidence has now been found, and the Court of Appeals recently ordered the district court to consider all the new “evidence as a whole.” So the case is far from over. I continue to confer on the case wit

ENDER RISK ASSESSMENT RE: Jeffrey Epstein SCID. $ 30129-2010 Please refer to the attached: I) Notification to sex offender, defense attorney and D.A.'s office of the scheduled risk assessment; 2.) Recommendation from Board of Examiners 3.) Notice of Right to Appeal and Appeal Application. Pleas

ard looked into all of this, made their recommendation, found him to have 130 points and I see no reason to disturb that." A.96:11-13 (Tr.). While the Court of Appeals has recognized that a Board-generated case summary may constitute "reliable hearsay" upon which the Court may base a SORA risk calculation, the law

NDER RISK ASSESSMENT RE: Jeffrey Epstein SCID. fi 30129-2010 Please refer to the attached: I) Notification to sex offender, defense attorney and D.A.'s office of the scheduled risk assessment; 2.) Recommendation from Board of Examiners 3.) Notice of Right to Appeal and Appeal Application. Pleas

ard looked into all of this, made their recommendation, found him to have 130 points and I see no reason to disturb that." A.96:11-13 (Tr.). While the Court of Appeals has recognized that a Board-generated case summary may constitute "reliable hearsay" upon which the Court may base a SORA risk calculation, the law