Epstein Secrets

s bid to dismiss his suit on technical grounds. Jesus Prado, who says he was forcibly removed from his

im a target of malicious prosecution in the Southern District, and that prosecutors never investigated his claims against Nike. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York on Monday declined to comment on the filings. But U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman in March said the scheme amounted to an illegal "shakedown" of a pu

en on the liberal standard of Rule 12(b)(6)." De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 87 F.3d 65, 70 (2d Cir

here- fore not discretionary and not protected by the FSIA); Napolitano v. Tishman Constr. Corp., No. 96 Civ. 4402(5.1), 1998 WL 102789, at •4 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 1998) (finding purchasing consulate buildings and hiring contractor to renovate is a plan- ning function and therefore discretionary). De

's bid to dismiss his suit on technical grounds. Jesus Prado, who says he was forcibly removed from his

im a target of malicious prosecution in the Southern District, and that prosecutors never investigated his claims against Nike. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York on Monday declined to comment on the filings. But U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman in March said the scheme amounted to an illegal "shakedown" of a pu