Epstein Secrets

ly could, putting them in grave danger. "These substances stimulated endurance, deadened nerves, increased oxygen intake and reduced inflammation," Sweeney told reporters. "What actually happened to these horses amounted to nothing less than abuse." He added: "They experienced cardiac issues, overexerti

ating a "different case, on a different topic all together" before they tripped on to the doping scheme and "one thing led to another," according to Sweeney. "We had one agent in particular (who) was actually an expert in this industry from (a) prior life," Sweeney said. "He was part of the team and the

some former prosecutors as an attempt to assert more control over investigations tied to Ukraine, especially those carried out by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. In addition to the Giuliani investigation, prosecutors are also looking into whether foreign money flowed into Trump's inaugural committee. The of

ll "one of the villains in this investigation" and compared her to a snake that "slithered away to a gorgeous property in New Hampshire." Thus, Mr. Sweeney offers the Government's, again flatly wrong, opinions about character and guilt while, at the same time, invoking a semi-biblical reference involvin

the public interests and the duty of the courts," Nixon, 435 U.S. at 602. See United States v. Cicale, No. 05-CR-60-2 (NGG), 2018 WL 388941, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2018) ("Compelling interests warranting closure of a courtroom—and, by extension, sealing of court documents— `may include the defendant's

elitheffffefilagtegtataf 8 The Honorable Alison J. Nathan July 21, 2020 Page 7 Respectfully Submitted, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca cc: U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York Mark Cohen Christian Everdell Cohen & Gresser LLP Laura A. Menninger Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. EFTA00075071 Cagesle120o140ZaUX.PertDo&Af

criminal liability, joint defense privilege is inapplicable), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 1842 (1997); Sheet Metal Workers International Association'. Sweeney, 29 F.3d 120, 124-25 (4th Cir. 1994) (any privilege arising from engaging in joint defense requires, as a threshold matter, a legitimate common int

ntervention as of right."); United Stalest. AT & T Co., 642 F.2d 1285, 1292 (D.C.Cir.1980); Sackman I. Liggett Group, Inc., 167 F.R.D. 6, 20-21 (E.D.N.Y. 1996). In allowing intervention, this Court notes that Garfinkel and Katzman have not demonstrated that Rosenbaum in fact served as their lawyer

hought processes of Plaintiffs attorneys will be revealed. See also In re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation, 119 F.R.D. 4, 5-6 (E.D.N.Y. & S.D.N.Y. 1988) (book of photographs, compiled by plaintiff's attorney, showing various forms of asbestos to which plaintiff had been exposed, was d

~ntitled to their day in court. My Office is proud to stand up for these victirr,ts by bringiqg this indictm~nt." FBI Assistant Director William F: Sweeney. Jr. said: "We are asking anyone.who may have been victimized by Jeffr.ey Epstein, qr anyqne who may have information abo\Jt his alleged criminal be

ocument Review As referenced in the Executive Summary, OPR obtained and reviewed hundreds of thousands of pages of documents from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO), other U.S. Attorney’s offices, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the

Judge July 8, 2019 Page 8 merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant’s application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring “at best . . . limi

Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 79 EFTA00224213 COURT CASES -- itik - - FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE D. Conn. U.S.. Sweeney, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73025 (D. Conn. 2006) Internet Stint Internet chat room "Ilovemucholdermen"several explicit conversations of sadistic s

le. Motion to exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from bag denied. See U.S. I Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) infra N.D.N.Y. U.S. I Johnson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) Internet Internet chat room; 37 yr-old male met 13 yr-old; 16 yr-old and one other und

2A(a)(5)(B) No Information 77 EFTA01729561 COtLJRT .:. CASES ,,. - •i-:.. # • tAcIfint .j' , 1APISCOMMEINICATION:::.: • :Crtagg - U.S. v. Sweeney, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73025 (D. Conn. 2006) Internet Internet chat room "Ilovemucholdermen"several explicit conversations of sadistic sexual b

003) No Information No information available. Motion to exclude pre-Miranda • statements and evidence from bag denied. 2422(b) No Information N.D.N.Y. U.S. v. Johnson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) No information available. Affirmed at 446 F.3d 272 (2d Cir. 2006) supra. In The Matt

77 EFTA00079490 COURT 4 "4:"..;-+ f4::: , CASE$.. -'fil - -C.V.-I' ... ,i;•-• '', . .. EFACILiTy ' IFAC*PhiNIUNfc,ATION. ' CHARGE U.S. v. Sweeney, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73025 (D. Conn. 2006) Internet Internet chat room "Ilovemucholdermen"several explicit conversations of sadistic sexual b

3) No Information No information available. Motion to exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from bag denied. 2422(b) No Information r N.D.N.Y. U.S. v. Johnson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) No information available. Affirmed at 446 F.3d 272 (2d Cir. 2006) supra. In The Matt

of enhancements. 2422(b) Not Consummated Sting 81 EFTA00226315 COURT - CASES'. FACILITY • FACTS/COMMUNICATION : CHARGE I). Conn. U.S. I Sweeney, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73025 (D. Conn. 2006) Internet Internet chat room "Ilovemucholdermen"several explicit conversations of sadistic sexual b

available. to exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from bag denied. See U.S., Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) infra N.D.N.Y. U.S. I. Johnson, . 2005 U.S. Dist LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) Internet Internet chat room; 37 yr-old male met 13 yr-old; 16 yr-old and one other