Epstein Secrets

mmon law right of access." Id. at 1245 (citation omitted). The appellate court found the lower court had abused its discretion in refusing to unseal Romero's Motion to Submit Pertinent Information to U.S. State & Justice Departments, with two attached declarations; Drummond's 3 EFTA00204872 sealed m

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, Vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION REQUESTING AN ORDER DIRECTING THE GOVERNMENT TO

ARRA; (2) the service of filings containing the aforementioned grand jury information shall be limited to counsel for Petitioners Jane Doe No.1 and Jance Doe No. 2 and for the government in Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA, and shall be accompanied by a copy of this Order; and (3) further dissemination by any

red on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 2 of 4 the asserted right of access against the other party's interest in keeping the information confidential." Romero at 1246, citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1309 (11' Cir. 2001). In balancing the competing interests, the c

red on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARFCA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO PROFFER GOVERNMENT CORRESPONDENCE IN SUPPORT O

Leggett), Daily Mail (01/07, Wright), Financial Times (01/06, Pfeifer, Bushey), New York Times (01/06, Walker, Chokshi), NBC News (01/06, Blackman, Romero), NPR (01/06, Kim), Politico (01/06, Pawlyk), CNN (01/07, Smart, Paget, Muntean, Razek), Al Jazeera (01/07, Staff Writer), Bloomberg (01/05, Schlan

as HB in court documents sued Classica Cruise Operator Ltd for the May 2023 incident. The article mentioned that her cabinmate, identified only as "Jane Doe" or "SE" in court documents, brought additional allegations against him in her complaint filed in West Palm Beach, Florida. The article added that D

ted by the 98th Congress 32 (1984). As to those persons, the Department says, 1 the old (repealed) law wi still apply. Id. See also United States Romero, 596 F.Supp. 446 (D.N.M.1984 . A similar ap- proach in this case is in accord with well established lel precedent. See, e.g., United States Pay

ied female in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen- year-old girl. 17 (8) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or