Epstein Secrets

state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States 'Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (It ch Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States I Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006)

that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as bein 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of thcir true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted f

tate interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI, 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006

that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as being 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of their true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Robson Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Laduke Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was

state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States' Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005Xunpublished); United StatesIStrevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI. 1697529 (II' Cir. 2006Xunpu

g that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as bein 18, and/or Mr. Ein i was not aware of their true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Statement at 12, Statement at 5, Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted from th