Epstein Secrets

tate interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005Xunpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006Xu

eatedly delivered to Mr. Epstein in small denominations in duffel bags and boxes. See, e.g., Puche, supra, 350 F. 3d 1137; see also United States v. Rahseparian, 231 F. 3d 1257 (10th Cir. 2000) (government failed to prove that defendant knew that money was obtained by mail fraud, the unlawful activity under

tate interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI, 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006

eatedly delivered to Mr. Epstein in small denominations in duffel bags and boxes. See, e.g., Puche, supra, 350 F. 3d 1137; see also United States v. Rahseparian, 231 F. 3d 1257 (10th Cir. 2000) (government failed to prove that defendant knew that money was obtained by mail fraud, the unlawful activity under

state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States' Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005Xunpublished); United StatesIStrevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI. 1697529 (II' Cir. 2006Xunpu

epeatedly delivered to Mr. Epstein in small denominations in duffel bags and boxes. See, e.g.. Puche, supra, 350, 3d 1137; see also United States v. Rahseparian, 231 k3d 1257 (10th Cir. 2000) (government failed to prove that defendant knew that money was o tained by mail fraud, the unlawful activi