6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
owed up. 2422(b); 2594(a) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting 50 EFTA00224184 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE 11. U.S.' Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting No specific information available but implication is that this is a sex t
k for him as a prostitute. Challenged application of federal statute to purely local activity. Court affirmed. 1591; 2422(b) Consummated U.S. I Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841 (11' Cir. 2006) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting Several telephone conversations arranging for travel to Costa Rica for se
tate interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005Xunpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006Xu
intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005Xunpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006Xunpublished), cert. denied, 127 U.S. 692 (2006). No such federal interest is implicated in the
state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States 'Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (It ch Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States I Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006)
intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States 'Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (It ch Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States I Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006)(unpublished), cert. denied, 127 U.S. 692 (2006). No such federal interest is implicated in th
ting 48 EFTA01729532 . .— . ... . COURT LASES . n. .!. C . i „... ,, ., . , .. ous 44 ,-;..f.,400fispmtclti textig L- . - . U.S. v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128 (11'' Cir. 2005) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting No specific information available but implication is that this is a sex
for him as a prostitute. Challenged application of federal statute to purely local activity. Court affirmed. 1591; 2422(b) Consummated U.S. v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841 (I l'h Cir. 2006) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting Several telephone conversations arranging for travel to Costa Rica for s
8 EFTA00079461 4 VAT ' ' ''; - . • *-- - il tlIitakt . . - -2 M lar ft; ..... IgeffAIKOE:% ASc. :4.e tfa.1. i' I. Aa.:1 Z' U.S. v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128 (111h Cir. 2005) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting No specific information available but implication is that this is a sex
for him as a prostitute. Challenged application of federal statute to purely local activity. Court affirmed. 1591; 2422(6) Consummated U.S. v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841 (I I th Cir. 2006) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting Several telephone conversations arranging for travel to Costa Rica for
tate interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI, 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006
ntervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI, 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006)(unpublished), cert. denied, 127 U.S. 692 (2006). No such federal interest is implicated in t
Entities connected to both Clarke and Strevell

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Marc Rich
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONGerald Lefcourt
PERSONEvans
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONSouthern District
LOCATION
Costa Rica
LOCATION
Michael Jackson
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON