Epstein Secrets

Fromi To: Cc: Jeff Pagliuca cipae,huca(tclunllaw.com>, Laura Memunger Klmennme,er(alimflaw.corn.?. bestentheim_mae.com <besternheirn(iipnac.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Activi

avid Boies, II [email protected] NYC Managing [email protected] Patrick J. Smith patrick.smith@smithvillazoccom suzanne.kowalski@smithvillazoccom Jeffrey S. Pagliuca [email protected] [email protected] Laura A. Menninger [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Bobb

Fromi To: Cc: Jeff Pagliuca cipae,huca(tclunllaw.com>, Laura Memunger Klmennm

et on or before November 22, 2021, and to justify any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/21)(jw) 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been elec

CT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GIIISLAINE MAXWE 'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON. M R AN & FOREMAN P.C. Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim

AINE MAXWE 'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON. M R AN & FOREMAN P.C

t "[b]efore any such common law right can attach, however, a court must first conclude that the documents at issue are indeed `judicial documents.' Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 119. "Once the court has determined that the documents are judicial documents and that therefore a common law presumption of access at

4 K7N9GIUD 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 150. Declaration of Mister -- how does he say it, Mr. Pagliuca? Say it again. MS. MENNINGER: Pagliuca. THE COURT: Mr. Pagliuca in opposition to the motion to compel. Unseal. 150-1. Additional pages from Ms. M

e minimally redacted material was subject to a "strong presumption" of access under the First Amendment and the common law. Id. at 47 & n.12 (citing Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 121-22). The deposition material at issue here, however, was not submitted to the district court in connection with summary judgment

q. Counsel for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell: HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C., 150 East 10th Avenue, Denver, CO 80203, By: Laura A. Menninger, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq., Ty Gee, Esq. Counsel for Intervenor Michael Cemovich: RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC, 100 Pearl Street, 14th Floor, Hartford, CT 06103, By: Jay

008) (finding that where classified information presented at trial, if disclosed, would jeopardize national security weighed against public access); Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) (existence of confidentiality order alone did not defeat presumption of public access); Hanf

s 48 hours to propose any redactions to the Courts Opinion and Order and to justify those redactions by reference tothe Second Circuits decision in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110(2d Cir. 2006). After determining which, if any, portions of the Opinion and Order should be redacted, the C

. 97. (Signed by Judge J. Nathan on 12/28/20)(jw) EFTA00031708 --- PAGE BREAK --- 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been electronically mailed to: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger Bobbi C Stemhein: Christian R. Everdell Mark Stewart Cohen 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been delivered by other means to: T