Epstein Secrets

e, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) 3 United States v. Thomas, 736 F.3d 54 (1st Cir. 2013) 6 ii EFTA00015305 --- PAGE BREAK --- Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. IV passim U.S. CONST. amend. V passim iii EFTA00015306 --- PAGE BREAK --- Ghislaine Maxwell moves under the Fourth Amendment, Martinde

idential information at the conclusion of the case, including Maxwell's deposition transcripts refused to do so although ordered to do so by Judge Sweet.' In its application to the governmen Not only did the government misunderstand how the Protective Order worked, but its argument also supports r

(d) 24 N.Y. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8, cmt. [6A] 16 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. IV 22 U.S. CONST. amend. V 21 U.S. CoNST. amend. VI 26 iii EFTA00028932 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Exhibits EXHIBIT J: Notes of Feb. II, 2021 Call with AUSA (Sealed) EXHIBIT K: Hand

rn District of New York to investigate and prosecute Epstein and Maxwell. Ex. J. Then, two months after the meeting with AUSA attorneys told Judge Sweet—who was presiding over defamation against Maxwell—that there was an 4 EFTA00028937 --- PAGE BREAK --- "ongoing criminal investigation" into Max

P. 5.2 19 M. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3(d) 24 MI. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8, cmt. [6A] 16 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. IV 22 U.S. CONST. amend. V 21 U.S. CoNST. amend. VI 26 iii EFTA00029103 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Exhibits EXHIBIT J: Notes of Fe

rn District of New York to investigate and prosecute Epstein and Maxwell. Ex. J. Then, two months after the meeting with AUSA attorneys told Judge Sweet—who was presiding over defamation against Maxwell—that there was an 4 EFTA00029108 --- PAGE BREAK --- "ongoing criminal investigation" into Max