3
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
3 / 5
Mentions
Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed
esented the case to the U.S. Attomey’s Office for the Southern District of Florida. In 2007, the Office contacted counsel
rights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific crimes affecting the victims. Citing Dean, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that the rights were expansive and could apply before charges were filed but were subject to the outer limit that the Government has at least
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014053 →, 689 (1972)). 1© See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 2006). 7 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 n.15 (citing Hanrahan v. United States, 348 F.2d 363, 366 n.6 (D.C. Cir. 1965)),; see WAYNE R. LAFAVE ET AL., CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 6.4(e), at 670 (3d ed. 2007) (“There is
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014069 →CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
sented the case to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. In 2007, the Office contacted counsel
ights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific crimes affecting the victims. Citing Dean, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that the rights ® John W. Gillis & Douglas E. Beloof, The Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in t
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017613 →, 689 (1972)). 76 See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 2006). ” OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 n.15 (citing Hanrahan v. United States, 348 F.2d 363, 366 n.6 (D.C. Cir. 1965)); see Wayne R. LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.4(e), at 670 (3d ed. 2007) ("There is a
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017624 →ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
ra Lyn Bassett, Recusal and the Supreme Court, 56 Hastings L.J_ 657, 678-79 (2005) (citing United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 211-12 & n.12 (1980); Hanrahan v. Hampton, 446 U.S. 1301, 1301 (1980)). 255 Model R. Prof] Conduct 4.4(a) (2007); see also ABA Criminal Justice Study, Standard 4-4.3 (1993). 256
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017668 →(9th Cir. 2006); United States v. Degenhardt, 405 F. Supp. 1341, 1343-44 (D. Utah 2005); see also United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 333 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (reaching same conclusion). *98 Bucklew Memo, supra note 580, app. a, at 299, 302-03. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017711 --- PAGE BREAK --
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017712 →Entities connected to both Hanrahan and District Court for the Southern District of New York

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Donald Trump
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONFederal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Reid Weingarten
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON