Epstein Secrets

17 A. Eleven. 18 Q. Who were you living with — who were you 19 living with when you went to Duncan Middle? 20 A. My grandmother. 21 Q. Ms. Brewer? 22 A. Yes. 23 Q. (Way. Who were you living with when you went 24 to Okeeheelee? 25 A. I was in between my grandmother and my Page 148 1 Q

k with 18 them? 19 MR. EDWARDS: Object to the form. 20 THE WITNESS: Yes. Yes, l did. 21 BY MR. CRITTON: 22 Q. All right. And then it says: 'Jane Doe's 23 status as a victim of a Federal offense was confirmed 24 when she was interviewed by Federal agents on May 28th. 25 2008." Page 138 1. co

5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 76 coming? A. Yes. Q. Okay. Who — who else was living with Ms. Brewer, in addition to yourself, at that time? A. I'm not sure. Q. Okay. Well, was the father of your child — A. Yes. Q. — excuse me -- living there at

d Mr. Hill's ellen ., will be referred to as , because how 11 that's 12 we referred to her, and she has -- she gave up 13 anonymity. 14 Jane Doe's 2 through 8, we may use their real 15 names, and then we'll just use, if it's 16 Sally Jones, it would be S.J. And then what you do 17 is, is o

ther 5 that you liked going to Mr. Epstein's house? 6 A. No. 7 Q. Did you -- did - o r ever meet 8 Mr. Epstein? 9 A. No. 10 Q. Did Ms. Brewer ever meet Mr. Epstein? 11 A. No. 12 Q. Have ou seen — other than — well, who I — at least , looking 13 you've seen 14 at her resume, she's

8-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-801092 VIDEO-CONFERENCED AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JANE DOE Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:37 a.m. - 6:10 p.m. One Clearlake Centre 250 South Australian Avenue, 1st Floor West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re

ion of misinformation). Gmppendynamik 22 Jahrg., Heft 2, 161-173. Wertheimer, M., Hilgard, E.R., Spilka, B, Tyler, L.E., Norman, R.D., Loftus, E.F., Brewer, M.B.. Ellis, H.C., Wollersheim, J.P., Kendler, H.H. (1991) A tale of two regions: The Rocky Mountains and the US Western. Zeitschriftfitr Psycholo

Balancing with the players stacked against you. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 365-366 (Book Review). Loftus, E.F. & Guyer, M. (2002) Who Abused Jane Doe?: The Hazards of the Single Case History. Skeptical Inquirer. Part I. Vol 26, #3 (May/June), Pp. 24-32. Loftus, E. F. & Guyer, M. J. (2002) Who Abu

il late after hours Monday, September 18th, 2017. As the Court is also aware, at the last hearing at which the Court ordered these deadlines, Mr. Brewer -- who is also a sole practitioner, who is my civil co-counsel in this matter -- indicated to the court in the transcript that he was going to be

?" Refusal to answer. Fifth Amendment. At page 73, "I would like to know whether you ever had any physical contact with the person referred to as Jane Doe in that federal complaint." Refusal to answer. Page 24. "Did you ever have any physical contact with Fifth Amendment. Refusal to answer. Page 26

enneth L. Ryskamp on 2/13/2009. (sh) (Entered: 02/13/2009) NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by William Chester Brewer, Jr on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein (Brewer, William) (Entered: 03/17/2009) ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Jeffrey Epstein.(Brewer. William) (Entered: 03/17/2009) MOTION for

MOTION to Compel Response to 1st RTP and 1st Interrogs filed by C.M.A.. (Hill. Jack) (Entered: 04/20/2009) 04/22/2009 63 MOTION for Leave to File Jane Doe's No. 101's Motion For Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to

cult for victims to discover after the fact that potential criminal charges against a criminal who has abused them have been secretly bargained away. Jane Doe Number One and Jane Doe Number Two, for example, were outraged when they discovered prosecutors had entered into an agreement blocking any prosecutio

United States v. MacDonald, 456 U.S. 1, 6-7 (1982)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 4 See, e.g., Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162, 172-73 (2001). 1 Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 398 (1977) (quoting Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 2, 689 (1972)). 1© See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 19

cult for victims to discover after the fact that potential criminal charges against a criminal who has abused them have been secretly bargained away. Jane Doe Number One and Jane Doe Number Two, for example, were outraged when they discovered prosecutors had entered into an agreement blocking any prosecutio

United States v. MacDonald, 456 U.S. 1, 6-7 (1982)) (internal quotation marks omitted). ™ See, e.g., Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162, 172-73 (2001). 75 Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 398 (1977) (quoting Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682, 689 (1972)). 76 See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191,