Epstein Secrets

ly compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment" United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). 4 EFTA00230133 1 .i i r- ate': , Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011

to provide information supporting whatever claim a victim may wish to assert in a motion for relief under section 3771(d)(3). In United States v. Rubin, 558 F.Supp.2d 411 (ED.N.Y. 2008), an alleged victim of a stock swindle claimed the right to confer in section 3771(aX5) included a right to obtain

lso repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct on the SpecialResponsibilities of a Prosecutor contains similar guidance. For example, there has been no civil or criminal fording by any judge or j

y compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). 4 EFTA00208094 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07'2011 Page 5 of 15 cri

so repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct on the Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor contains similar guidance. For example, there has been no civil or criminal finding by any judge or

ally compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment." United States. Rubin , 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). UPetitioners have no similar obligation. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(A). F6It is worth noting that, wi

ge and Justice Department official, of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct on the Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor contains similar guidance. For example, there has been no civil or criminal finding by any judge or

y compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). 4 EFTA00212575 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07'2011 Page 5 of 15 cri

so repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct on the Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor contains similar guidance. For example, there has been no civil or criminal finding by any judge or

ly compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment." United States'. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). 4 EFTA00177118 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 5 of 15 crim

lso repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct on the Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor contains similar guidance. For example, there has been no civil or criminal finding by any judge or

lly compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment" United States'. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). 4 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000887 EFTA00230711 1 .i i r- ate': , Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entere

lso repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct on the SpecialResponsibilities of a Prosecutor contains similar guidance. For example, there has been no civil or criminal fording by any judge or j