Epstein Secrets

ly compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment" United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). 4 EFTA00230133 1 .i i r- ate': , Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011

to provide information supporting whatever claim a victim may wish to assert in a motion for relief under section 3771(d)(3). In United States v. Rubin, 558 F.Supp.2d 411 (ED.N.Y. 2008), an alleged victim of a stock swindle claimed the right to confer in section 3771(aX5) included a right to obtain

RELEVANT EVIDENCE Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing The U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence, and states: L THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT CREATES NO LEGAL DUTY UPON THE U.S. ATTO

n. Id. at 394 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). Federal district courts have reached similar conclusions. See, e.g., United States'. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417 n.5 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) (discussing victims' "ability to seek pre-prosecution relief' under the CVRA); United States.. Okun,

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

. Id. at 394 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). Federal district courts have reached similar conclusions. See, e.g., United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417 n.5 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) (discussing victims' "ability to seek pre-prosecution relief' under the CVRA); United States v. Okun,

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

n. Id. at 394 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). Federal district courts have reached similar conclusions. See, e.g., United States'. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417 n.5 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) (discussing victims' "ability to seek pre-prosecution relief' under the CVRA); United States.. Okun,

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

. Id. at 394 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). Federal district courts have reached similar conclusions. See, e.g., United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417 n.5 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) (discussing victims' "ability to seek pre-prosecution relief' under the CVRA); United States v. Okun,

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

n. Id. at 394 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). Federal district courts have reached similar conclusions. See, e.g., United States'. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417 n.5 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) (discussing victims' "ability to seek pre-prosecution relief' under the CVRA); United States.. Okun,

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

. Id. at 394 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). Federal district courts have reached similar conclusions. See, e.g., United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417 n.5 2008) (discussing victims' "ability to seek pre-prosecution relief' under the CVRA); United States v. Okun, No. 08-13

ed on the record at the August 12, 2011 hearing on this motion, the Court will deny Plaintiffs' request to have their facts accepted as true. III. Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Plaintiffs request an order from the Court "directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not t

ly compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment." United States'. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). 4 EFTA00177118 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 5 of 15 crim

RELEVANT EVIDENCE Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doc #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing The U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence, and states: I. THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT CREATES NO LEGAL DUTY UPON THE U.S. ATT

lly compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment" United States'. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). 4 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000887 EFTA00230711 1 .i i r- ate': , Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entere

RELEVANT EVIDENCE Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing The U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence, and states: L THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT CREATES NO LEGAL DUTY UPON THE U.S. ATTO