Epstein Secrets

i0on IDA_ H. Smuggle K Casperde M. Manlarr i e. LOMB Dave Eitype EL gartitursie N. NelUoinogen P. Paraphernalia/ U Uranown C. Cocaine 1A Manson Eoupment paVAAe P Possess T. T o E Use Pera 2 Other A Amphetamine E. Heroin 0. 9;ilurniDerie S i c i g 0.2* Charge DescadeOn Oomeelic

vised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review Mr. Josefsberg's outstanding bills on a line-by-line basis and attempt to reach a non- adversarial resolution of all outstanding fee issues. Mr. Critton also transm

emain confidential," Document 29 at 2. Further, you deemed the NPA "confidential," for understandable purposes, in your September 3, 2008 letter to Robert Josefsberg in which you informed him that Judge Marra had set forth procedures for providing the NPA only to those counsel and "victims" who executed a Protec

costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review Mr. Josefsberg's outstan

nd September 9, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE 293); and Manson v. United States, 244 U.S. 362, 365 (1917). More

nsel for Plaint/ff in Related Case No. 08-08804 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck,

'the tlueat of prosecution is real, substantial and present."' See August 4, 2009 Order (DE 242) and September 9, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE 293); and Manson v. United States, 244 U.S. 362, 365 (1917). Moreover, as this court knows, the NPA only defers prosecution in the 6 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Doc

enue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 [email protected] Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 rjosefsb

and September 9, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE 293); and Manson v. United States, 244 U.S. 362,365 (1917). More

nsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck,

Devekprisen• INO) funding For ems( inseam. For the rederalopment of abandoned ad harm and residecrial amides HERA vies amended, and appopriad on Manson:el S2 bil‘on o:amide For 440 lam purpose "s word rand of neighborhood siobloorion fords mind to as Neighbahcod So6L:000n Program 2 (NISP.21 ts aro

the 12th claim by a young woman who also says she was lured to his Palm Beach mansion as a teen and sexually abused. Prominent Miami at- torney Robert Josefsberg filed the most recent federal lawsuit last week, on behalf of the Jane Doe 101 who allegedly visited Epstein a few times while 17 years old and