Epstein Secrets

Independent Counsel Pearson closed his investigation, Mr. Biran became a Trial Attorney in the Public Integrity Section at the Justice Department's Criminal Division. He worked in the Public Integrity Section from 1996 to 2000, investigating and prosecuting corruption cases throughout the United States. On occas

obligations in representing Assistant United States Attorney Villafafta) in connection with an investigation conducted by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility; (2) the entry of a Protective Order; and (3) the sealing of this Application, and the accompanying Orders. BACKGROUND 1. From 2006 to 2008, t

ian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33132 FAX Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-003726 EFTA00086396 pirm—Au —evict U.S. Department et JliSrICC Criminal Division WiedlOPUM.PIAWARIIIMOORIrel The Honorable R. Alexander Acosta . United States Attorney , {r.; • • west Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Attention:

ocuments subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation Box #3 P-013227 April 23, 2008 Memo from to Privacy Act Office of Professional Responsibility re Self Reporting, Corrected Version of the previously submitted April 21, 2008 Lett Box #3 P-013226 Thm P-013230 April 21, 2008 Letter from

or: A. Marie Villafana. Addressees: R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney; Jeff Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney; Matthew Menchel, Chief, Criminal Division; Andrew Lourie; Managing Assistant U.S. Attorney, Northern Region; and Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Region. (P). Draft Indictment (54 pages)(P)

(5 pages); Author: A. Marie Villafana. E-mail, Jay Lefkowitz to Alex Acosta, dated February 29, 2008 3:11 p.m., RE: Fw Epstein (1 page) Letter to Office of Professional Responsibility, U.S. Department of Justice, dated April 21, 2008, RE: Self Reporting — Jeffrey H. Sloman, FAUSA S.D.F.L. (3 pages, with 5 pages of attachments); A

tions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confident

our review of this case is limited both factually and legally. We have not looked at the entire universe of facts in this case. It is not the role of the Criminal Division to conduct a complete factual inquiry from scratch.” (CEOS letter at p. 1). Indeed, entire subject areas relevant to the inquiry were not considered

ns with Victims during the Investigation November 2020 EFTA00011476 --- PAGE BREAK --- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Justice (Department) Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigated allegations that in 2007-2008, prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO) improperly

ewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys. The records included emails, letters, memoranda, and investigative materials. OPR also collected and

ns with Victims during the Investigation November 2020 EFTA00023060 --- PAGE BREAK --- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Justice (Department) Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigated allegations that in 2007-2008, prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO) improperly

ewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys. The records included emails, letters, memoranda, and investigative materials. OPR also collected and