Epstein Secrets

ing balance Ending balance Date 11/29/2006 1/2/2007 Amount $1,965.43 $120.77 Date Payee Amount Description Deposit Balance 1 11/9/2006 Starbucks $7.41 Coffee $1,958.02 2 11/12/2006 Subway Sandwiches $6.16 Meal $1,951.86 3 11/13/2006 Starbucks $3.41 Coffee $1,948.45 4 11/13/2006 Hale $

e $0.00 $378.82 16 2/14/2005 Publix $41.69 Grocery $0.00 $337.13 17 2/15/2005 Main Street News $4.53 Newspapers $0.00 $332.60 18 2/15/2005 Starbucks $6.82 Coffee $0.00 $325.78 19 2/16/2005 Office Depot $14.38 Office supplies $0.00 $311.40 20 2/16/2005 Wireless Dimensions $58.42 Cell phone

to address your concern about criminal exposure, i f your client complies with every provision of this agreement, then the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("this Office") will treat all statements made by your client during said debriefing as statements made pursuant to Rule 11(f) of the Fe

posed deal and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." Such statement is further evidence of the fact that Epstein's counsel, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the State of Flor

hers.' EPSTEIN'S FEDERAL PLEA NEGOTIATIONS 9. From January 5, 2007 through September 2007, plea discussions took place between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein, who was represented by numerous attomeys.22 10. On February I, 2007, the Epstein defense team sent a 24-page letter

agreement and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." (DE 407 at ¶ 33.) On September 21, 2007, the line prosecutor emailed Epstein's counsel stating, "I think that the attache

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

agreement and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." (DE 407 at ¶ 33.) On September 21, 2007, the line prosecutor emailed Epstein's counsel stating, "I think that the attache

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

posed deal and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." Such statement is further evidence of the fact that Epstein's counsel, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the State of Flor

hers.' EPSTEIN'S FEDERAL PLEA NEGOTIATIONS 9. From January 5, 2007 through September 2007, plea discussions took place between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein, who was represented by numerous attomeys.22 10. On February I, 2007, the Epstein defense team sent a 24-page letter

agreement and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." (DE 407 at ¶ 33.) On September 21, 2007, the line prosecutor emailed Epstein's counsel stating, "I think that the attache

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

agreement and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." (DE 407 at ¶ 33.) On September 21, 2007, the line prosecutor emailed Epstein's counsel stating, "I think that the attache

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

agreement and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." (DE 407 at ¶ 33.) On September 21, 2007, the line prosecutor emailed Epstein's counsel stating, "I think that the attache

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

posed deal and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation."46 Such statement is further evidence of the fact that Epstein's counsel, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the State of Flo

ers 2' EPSTEIN'S FEDERAL PLEA NEGOTIATIONS 9. From January 5, 2007 through September 2007, plea discussions took place between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein, who was represented by numerous attorneys.22 10. On February 1, 2007, the Epstein defense team sent a 24-page letter

posed deal and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation:" 6 Such statement is further evidence of the fact that Epstein's counsel, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the State of Flo

hers?' EPSTEIN'S FEDERAL PLEA NEGOTIATIONS 9. From January 5, 2007 through September 2007, plea discussions took place between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein, who was represented by numerous attorneys?? 10. On February I, 2007, the Epstein defense team sent a 24-page letter