Epstein Secrets

n’t put in writing,” Krischer wrote, shortly after the non-prosecution agreement was sighed. "After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks .and have a conversation.” Many ofthe notes that were exchanged dealt with prosecutors’ and Epstein’s lawyers’ shared desire to keep the deal secret

007. However, at the request of Epstein's lawyers, the indictment was never presented to a federal grand jury. 25. Instead, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alexander Acosta, negotiated a plea deal with Epstein's team of lawyers to grant immunity to Epstein (along with four named co-conspirators and an

t put in writing," Krischer wrote, shortly after the non-prosecution agreement was signed. "After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." Many of the notes that were exchanged dealt with prosecutors' and Epstein's lawyers' shared desire to keep the deal sec

07. However, at the request of Epstein’s lawyers, the indictment was never presented to a federal grand jury. 22. Instead, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alexander Acosta, negotiated a plea deal with Epstein’s team of lawyers to grant immunity to Epstein (along with four named co-conspirators and an

agreement and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." (DE 407 at ¶ 33.) On September 21, 2007, the line prosecutor emailed Epstein's counsel stating, "I think that the attache

a thorough investigation." (DE 407 at ¶ 93.) The January 10, 2008 notification letters did not disclose that the Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 case in the Southern District of Florida was the subject of the NPA entered into by Epstein and the Office, or that there had been any potentially binding resolution. (DE 407 at ¶ 94.) Othe

agreement and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation." (DE 407 at ¶ 33.) On September 21, 2007, the line prosecutor emailed Epstein's counsel stating, "I think that the attache

a thorough investigation." (DE 407 at ¶ 93.) The January 10, 2008 notification letters did not disclose that the Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 case in the Southern District of Florida was the subject of the NPA entered into by Epstein and the Office, or that there had been any potentially binding resolution. (DE 407 at ¶ 94.) Othe

agreement and added: 'Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation.'" (emphasis added)). Accordingly, if the Court grants the Government's request for delay, Jane Doe 1 and 2 request that du

College of Law at the University of Utah 383 S. University St. Salt Lake Ci , UT 84112 March 4, 2019 Ms. Arian Fajardo Orshan U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida 500 E. Broward Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Via email: [email protected] Re: Protecting the Rights of ieffrey Epstein's Victims Dear Ms.