Epstein Secrets

was going to go there, that today counsel has raised the idea that the compiled-for standard applies. And I've seen that before — it comes out of John Doe v. John Doe Corporation of the Supreme Court — I get that, that compiled-for is measured for at the time of the request. I just don't know whether

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 is: That articulation comes awful close to the standard that a prosecutor would be flying under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 in terms of primary source Rule 16 discovery. I'm asking you how the materials withheld, in effect with the blessing of the civil div

was going to go there, that today counsel has raised the idea that the compiled-for standard applies. And I've seen that before — it comes out of John Doe v. John Doe Corporation of the Supreme Court — I get that, that compiled-for is measured for at the time of the request. I just don't know whether

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 is: That articulation comes awful close to the standard that a prosecutor would be flying under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 in terms of primary source Rule 16 discovery. I'm asking you how the materials withheld, in effect with the blessing of the civil div

(4th Cir.1992) (opinion work product "absolutely immune" from discovery); In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 625 (4th Cir.1988); In re John Doe, 662 F. 2d 1073, 1080 ( 4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1000, 102 *463 S.Ct. 1632, 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982) (opinion O 2011 Thomson Reuters. N

n confidential. As such, they are protected by the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel and the express language of Rule 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(0. FED. R. EvID. 410 (discussions made during plea negotiations are "not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the