Epstein Secrets

d 1188, 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); and Doherty v. John Doe No. 22, 957 So.2d 1267 (4th DCA 2007). A reading

inst Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein". Erie R.Co. v. Tompkins, 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). Accordingly, the privileges

dnote 2 for full text of §39.204, Fla. Stat.2 (¶'s Motion, p. 8-9). See Carson v. Jackson, 466 So.2d 1188, 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); and Doherty v. John Doe No. 22, 957 So.2d 1267 (4th DCA 2007). A reading of these cases establishes that §39.204 does not provide Plaintiff with a carte blanche access to D

ed claims in Counts I - Sexual Battery and Counts II - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress are also controlled by state law. Erie R.Co. v. Tompkins, 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). Accordingly, the privileges recognized under state law apply to this action under Rule 501. See, for example, 1550 Brickell A

7, doe #36) (cd) (Entered: 02/25/1998) 03/09/1998 STIPULATION and ORDER, reset answer to second amended complaint due for 2/27/98 for X Corp, for John Doe, for Ivan Fisher ( signed by Judge Chin ) (orig. doc. filed in case #96 civ. 8307, doc. #38) (ae) (Entered: 03/10/1998) 03/09/1998 Filed Memo-End

.68 (S.D.N.Y.1989). See Klaxon Co. Ste for Electric Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487. 496, 6 S.Ct. 1020. 1021. 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941): see also Erie R. Co.)! Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64. 78. 58 SO. 817, 822. LEd. 1188 (1938). Under New York's choice of law rules, when a court Is construing the meaning of a contract.