Epstein Secrets

ase 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2009 Page 5 of 8 Entertainment Corp., 2006 WL 333621 (M.D. Fla) and Tracey v. Sarasota County, 2006 WL 1678908 (M.D. Fla.). WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, C.M.A., respectfully requests that this Court enter an order: a. Limiting the time for

CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

2013. http://jimjansen.blogspot.com/2013/03/gomc-presentation-to-students-at.html Presentation, Casual Living Conference 2012, 22-24 February 2012, Sarasota, FL. htto://accentsandfurnishings.com/conferences/casuallivingconference/2012/index.html 74 EFTA00601650 Invited Talks (Selected)! Keynote, The

76 EFTA00601652 Appendix B Testimony Cases Last Four Years Year Retained Deliverables Retained by Case 2016 Deposition Report Plaintiff Jane Doe v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.; BHP Billiton Petroleum (Deepwater) Ltd.; Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Aramark Services, In

vances in research on eyewitness testimony. In C.P. Ewing (Ed.), Psychology, Psychiatry and the Law: A Clinical and Forensic Handbook (pp. 417-439). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange. Loftus, E.F. & Goodman, J. (1985). Questioning witnesses. In S. Kassin & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), The Psychology

Balancing with the players stacked against you. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 365-366 (Book Review). Loftus, E.F. & Guyer, M. (2002) Who Abused Jane Doe?: The Hazards of the Single Case History. Skeptical Inquirer. Part I. Vol 26, #3 (May/June), Pp. 24-32. Loftus, E. F. & Guyer, M. J. (2002) Who Abu