Epstein Secrets

neonatal motoric activity (Selz et al, 1995), and nuchal atonia duration sequences (associated with putative intra-uterine REM sleep) in fetal sheep (Anderson et al, 1998). Sequential amplitudes in 1 Hz stimulated soleus spinal cord H-reflex demonstrated a $F 6B ~ 0.83 in control subjects and, reflecting

F., Muller, J. (1996) Depression as a dynamic disease. Biol. Psychiat. 39:991-999 Pijn, J., Velis, D., van der Heyden, M., DeGoede, J., van Veelen, C.W., Lopes da Silva, F. (1997): Nonlinear dynamics of epileptic seizures on basis of intracranial EEG recordings. Brain Topogr. 9:249-70 Pincus, S.M. (

e process because the litigants and the courts assume that the sole purpose of discovery is to assist trial preparation.") (quoting United States'. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441(11'h Cir. 1986; emphasis in original). See also Anderson, 799 F.2d at 1441 ("Historically, discovery materials were not availa

eference to the ages of the minor victims and, upon conviction, did not require sex offender registration. 3. Jane Doe #1 is a woman with initials C.W., and Jane Doe #2 is a woman with initials T.M. Both were victims of Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. Bo

ly not only to references to unitidicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g.. United States v. Anderson, 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest issue, the court c

r victims [including C.W.J were contacted and these provisions were discussed' (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement " (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted above

pply not only to references to unindicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g.. United States'. Anderson, 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest issue, the court c

r victims [including C.W.] were contacted and these provisions were discussed' (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement " (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted above