Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
tics that sexually abused children exhibit" but may not usurp the jury's role of assessing the credibility of any specific victim); United States v. Telles, 6 F.4th 1086, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 2021) (same). This analysis is referred to in the case relied upon by the Defense, United States v. Raymond, and
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
tics that sexually abused children exhibit" but may not usurp the jury's role of assessing the credibility of any specific victim); United States v. Telles, 6 F.4th 1086, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 2021) (same). This analysis is referred to in the case relied upon by the Defense, United States v. Raymond, and
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
tics that sexually abused children exhibit" but may not usurp the jury's role of assessing the credibility of any specific victim); United States v. Telles, 6 F.4th 1086, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 2021) (same). This analysis is referred to in the case relied upon by the Defense, United States v. Raymond, and
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00016478
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
Page: EFTA00016478 →Page EFTA00016479
tics that sexually abused children exhibit" but may not usurp the jury's role of assessing the credibility of any specific victim); United States v. Telles, 6 F.4th 1086, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 2021) (same). This analysis is referred to in the case relied upon by the Defense, United States v. Raymond, and
Page: EFTA00016479 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (41)
Entities connected to both Mulder and Telles
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON16 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
United States
LOCATION16 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Telles
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON15 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
Julie K. Brown
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Telles
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Telles
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Telles
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·3 w/ Telles
Torres
PERSON9 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
Russell Simmons
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
RA
Randall
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
RO
Rocchio
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
DA
Daubert
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
DB
Doug Band
PERSON8 w/ Mulder·2 w/ Telles
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON4 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
Elon Musk
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Telles
Raymond
PERSON4 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
EN
Engelmayer
PERSON4 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
DU
Dupigny
PERSON4 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles
NI
Nimely
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Telles
HA
Halamek
PERSON4 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Telles