Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
2
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h Circuit soundly rejected the argument, citing the other circuits reaching the same conclusion. Jones , 471 F.3d at 538-39 (citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (1
s] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States v. Yang , 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h Circuit soundly rejected the argument, citing the other circuits reaching the same conclusion. Jones , 471 F.3d at 538-39 (citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (1
s] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States v. Yang , 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857524_p6
h Circuit soundly rejected the argument, citing the other circuits reaching the same conclusion. Jones, 471 F.3d at 538-39 (citing United States v. Griffith, 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor, 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum, 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th
Page: EFTA02857524_p6 →Page EFTA02857524_p17
's] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States v. Yang, 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham, 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois, 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th
Page: EFTA02857524_p17 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857732_p3
h Circuit soundly rejected the argument, citing the other circuits reaching the same conclusion. Jones , 471 F.3d at 538-39 (citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (1
Page: EFTA02857732_p3 →Page EFTA02857732_p9
s] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States v. Yang , 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th
Page: EFTA02857732_p9 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857763_p3
h Circuit soundly rejected the argument, citing the other circuits reaching the same conclusion. Jones , 471 F.3d at 538-39 (citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (1
Page: EFTA02857763_p3 →Page EFTA02857763_p9
s] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States v. Yang , 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th
Page: EFTA02857763_p9 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857810_p3
h Circuit soundly rejected the argument, citing the other circuits reaching the same conclusion. Jones , 471 F.3d at 538-39 (citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (1
Page: EFTA02857810_p3 →Page EFTA02857810_p9
s] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States v. Yang , 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th
Page: EFTA02857810_p9 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (161)
Entities connected to both Griffith and Meacham
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON48 w/ Griffith·12 w/ Meacham
United States
LOCATION33 w/ Griffith·13 w/ Meacham
LB
Leon Black
PERSON23 w/ Griffith·10 w/ Meacham
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION22 w/ Griffith·8 w/ Meacham
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON20 w/ Griffith·10 w/ Meacham
Marc Rich
PERSON20 w/ Griffith·10 w/ Meacham
EV
Evans
PERSON20 w/ Griffith·7 w/ Meacham
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON17 w/ Griffith·9 w/ Meacham
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON17 w/ Griffith·9 w/ Meacham
Mortensen
PERSON12 w/ Griffith·11 w/ Meacham
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON14 w/ Griffith·9 w/ Meacham
EL
Ellis
PERSON12 w/ Griffith·11 w/ Meacham
Alexander Acosta
PERSON12 w/ Griffith·10 w/ Meacham
HA
Hayward
PERSON11 w/ Griffith·10 w/ Meacham
GA
Garcia-Lopez
PERSON11 w/ Griffith·9 w/ Meacham
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION16 w/ Griffith·4 w/ Meacham
GL
Gerald Lefcourt
PERSON12 w/ Griffith·8 w/ Meacham
Naomi Campbell
PERSON9 w/ Griffith·11 w/ Meacham
Figueroa
PERSON13 w/ Griffith·6 w/ Meacham
AS
Ann Sanchez
PERSON11 w/ Griffith·8 w/ Meacham