Epstein Secrets

. 3059 Grand Avenue Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Michael J. Pike, Esquire Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 North Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 [email protected] [email protected] s/ Brad Edwards B

01 [email protected] Michael R. Tein, Esquire Lewis Tein, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Michael J. Pike, Esquire Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 North Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

. 3059 Grand Avenue Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 teinAlewistein.com Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Michael J. Pike, Esquire Burman, Critton, Limier & Coleman, LLP 515 North Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 [email protected] [email protected] s/ Brad Edwards B

r victims [including C.W.] were contacted and these provisions were discussed" (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement ....." (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted a

es incurred and for any other relief to which he is entitled under the law. Jury Trial Plaintiff demands Jury Trial on all issues so triable. By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (Counsel for Jeffr

r coercion and specifically states that he never pulled her close to him in a sexual way, p. 21. As to the other girls that were brought, including C.W., L.M. said that some of the girls were topless, and some were not and Epstein didn't mind, p. 23; she admits having brought approximately 30 plus g

ls were topless, and some were not and Epstein didn't mind, p. 23; she admits having brought approximately 30 plus girls to Epstein; she admits that C.W. was her baby's father's girlfriend at the time that she met her. She testified that "None of my girls ever had a problem and they call me. They'd b

.W. 50 Willia; J. verger SERVICE LIST Jane Kreusler-Walsh Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A. 11 EFTA00233742 Robert D. Critton Burman, Critton. Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, P.A. U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Pal

were provided to the victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA a¶ 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the 1:131. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered

, and to S.R. on May 30, 2008. Villafafla Decl., ¶ 3. Throughout the investigation, AUSAInauld the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist had contact with C.W. ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation, T.M. was represented by James Eisenberg, E:sq. Consequently, all contact with T.M. was made through Mr. Eisenber

] . . .lawsuit[] EFTA00230174 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 3 of 10 Letter from Bradley J. Edwards to Robert D. Critton, Jr., Case No. 9:08-CV-80893, Doc. #214 (attachment 2). On September 2, 2010, Epstein filed a motion for a protective order, seeking to bar disclo

r victims [including C.W.J were contacted and these provisions were discussed' (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement " (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted above

CV-MARRA 000928 EFTA00230752 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 3 of 10 Letter from Bradley J. Edwards to Robert D. Critton, Jr., Case No. 9:08-CV-80893, Doc. #214 (attachment 2). On September 2, 2010, Epstein filed a motion for a protective order, seeking to bar disclo

r victims [including C.W.] were contacted and these provisions were discussed' (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement " (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted above