Epstein Secrets

. Accordingly, Plaintiff's cause of action thereunder is barred. WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny the relief sought by Plaintiff. Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Epstein EFTA00221254 Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Document 115-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 10 of 10 Jane D

f what the law intends to do if a certain line is passed. To make the warning fair, so far as possible the line should be clear.' " United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 265, 117 S.Ct. 1219, 137 L.Ed.2d 432 (1997) (quoting McBoyle v. United States, 283 U.S. 25, 27, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931)) (

. Accordingly, Plaintiff's cause of action thereunder is barred. WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny the relief sought by Plaintiff. Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attomey for Defendant Epstein EFTA00221886 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 148-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 10 of 10 Jane Do

f what the law intends to do if a certain line is passed. To make the warning fair, so far as possible the line should be clear.' " United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 265, 117 S.Ct. 1219, 137 L.Ed.2d 432 (1997) (quoting McBovle v. United States 283 U.S. 25, 27, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931)) (o

y personal knowledge. 3. The costs and fees set forth in the motion are true, correct and reasonable. FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. Robert . Critton, Jr. .XHIBIT 6 09/12/2019 P CONFIDE CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19411 SDNY_GM_00331984 EFTA _00204710 EFTA02729694 Case 9O8-cv-501

vit of Jeffrey Epstein and Igor Zinoviev, Exhibit 4 and 5, respectively. 12. The entire incident was completely unknown to the undersigned and Mr. Lanier until Adam Horowitz, Esq. came in and announced that the deposition was not going to take place in that Mr. Epstein and his client saw one another,

119-MARRA/JOHNSON SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Isidro Manual Garcia Innle ' Katherine Warthen ell Michael James Pike Paul G Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg Adam

f what the law intends to do if a certain line is passed. To make the warning fair, so far as possible the line should be clear.' " United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 265, 117 S.Ct. 1219, 137 L.Ed.2d 432 (1997) (quoting McBovle v. United States 283 U.S. 25, 27, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931)) (o