Epstein Secrets

bin/DktRptpl?859999798355213-L_801_0-1 6/10/2009 EFTA00175416 CM/ECP -.Live Database - flsd Page 2 of 12 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Robert Deweese Critton , Jr. Burman Critton Luther & Coleman 515 N Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918 Amicus United States of America ax: Emai

. (ir) (Entered: 08/25/2008) 09/15/2008 8 r 129.4 KB NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Deweese Critton, Jr on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 09/15/2008) 09/30/2008 9 r 53.1 KB ORDER TO RESPOND re 3 MOTION to keep True Name in Sealed Envelope filed by Jane Doe, 2 M

101 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 08-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robert Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 25

v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). See also Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami FL 33130-1780 Fax: Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED represented by Robert Deweese Critton , Jr. Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman https://ecf.flsd.useourts.gov/egi-bin/DIctRpt.p17825839498761356-L_801_0-1 6/10/2009 EFTA00175220 CM/ECF

/04/2009) 05/11/2009 5 r RESPONSE/REPLY to 4 Sealed Document, 3 Sealed Document Opposition to Motion to Proceed Anonymously by Jeffrey Epstein. (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 05/11/2009) 05/11/2009 6 r NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Deweese Critton, Jr on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein (Critton

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

ton Luttier & Coleman 515 N Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918 Fax: 515-3148 Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Robert Deweese Critton , Jr. Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 515 N Flagler Drive Suite 400 s P Im Beach , FL 33401-2918 Fax: Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NO

10/06/2008 41 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 3.7 Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 10/24/2008 (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 10/06/2008) 10 `06%2008 42 MOTION for More Definite Statement directed to amended complaint by Jeffrey Epstein. See image DE 4

, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41h DCA 1983); Malloy I Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

10/06/2008 52 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 10/24/2008 (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 10/06/2008) 10/24/2008 53 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 52 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Am

09 Page 8 of 8 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Golc s i lber er Esq. Robert D. Critton. Es /s/ Adam D. Horowitz - 8 - EFTA00175866 Case 9:08-cv-8 11-KAM Document 71 Entered FLSD Docket 04 009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRI

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi 1 Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy i Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

10/06/2008 46 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 10/24/2008 (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 10/06/2008) 10/24/2008 4/ Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 46 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Am

Fax. 6 EFTA00175615 Case 9:08-cv-80( •KAM Document 40 Entered d LSD Docket Ofd '2008 Page 7 of 8 CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON By: Robert D. Critton, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 224162 [email protected] Michael J. Pike, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Jetty Epstein CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-Incrimination. See DeLisi I Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41b DCA 1983)• Malloy I Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

l of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 141 day of April, 2010. Respectfully submitted, Br ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLE

safe harbor of the 5'" Amendment2 ate Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (1991). 2 See PeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4d. DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan. 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964Xthe Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

Epstein Respectfully sub By:---;--.,,--.,...--- ROBERT D CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar o. 224162 rcrit@bclclaw.

ns. Company. 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth A

. Accordingly, Plaintiff's cause of action thereunder is barred. WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny the relief sought by Plaintiff. Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Epstein EFTA00221254 Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Document 115-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 10 of 10 Jane D

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

. Accordingly, Plaintiff's cause of action thereunder is barred. WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny the relief sought by Plaintiff. Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attomey for Defendant Epstein EFTA00221886 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 148-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 10 of 10 Jane Do

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

10/06/2008 54 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 10/24/2008 (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 10/06/2008) 10/24/2008 55 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 54 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Am

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy'. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou