Epstein Secrets

belief, ROTHSTEIN and others offered other investors like the entity D3 fabricated investment opportunities in the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN. Fisten (a former Dade County police officer with a questionable police record and RRA investigator) and Jenne (a former attorney, Broward County Sheriff an

naming additional Defendants was filed. 21. In addition, and upon information and belief, ROTHSTEIN, David Boden, Debbie Villegas, Andrew Barnett, Michael Fisten and Kenneth Jenne (all employees of RRA) through brokers or middlemen would stage regular meetings during which false statements were made about th

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The United States in United States of America'. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer a

belief, ROTHSTEIN and others offered other investors like the entity D3 fabricated investment opportunities in the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN. Fisten (a former Dade County police officer with a questionable police record and RRA investigator) and Jenne (a former attorney, Broward County Sheriff an

naming additional Defendants was filed. 21. In addition, and upon information and belief, ROTHSTEIN, David Boden, Debbie Vilieges, Andrew Barnett, Michael Fisten and Kenneth Jenne (all employees of RRA) through brokers or middlemen would stage regular meetings during which false statements were made about th

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The United States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer a

t 14. RRA employed a number of investigators used in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions. Those investigators included, but were not limited to Michael Fisten ("Fisten") and Ken Jenne, ("Jenne"), employees of RRA. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to Edwards and to whom they reporte

yed a number of investigators used in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions. Those investigators included, but were not limited to Michael Fisten ("Fisten") and Ken Jenne, ("Jenne"), employees of RRA. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to Edwards and to whom they reported to cond

hree civil cases, alleging sexual assault and battery. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80893, ("Jane Doe") U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein, ("LM") Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and, E.W. v. Epstein, ("EW") 50 2008 CA 028058XXXXMB-AB. ("Epstein Actions

ase No. 09-CV-81092. 32. Admit that Ken Jenne was involved in the decision to file the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 33. Admit that Michael Fisten was involved in the decision to file the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 34. Admit that in paragraph 9 of the Complaint (DE #1) in Case

to be filed a Complaint (DE #1) on behalf of M. in the case styled M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-81092 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division on July 24, 2009. A copy of the Complaint is attached as Exhibit A. 2. Admit that a Complaint (DE #1) was filed on beha

ase No. 09-CV-81092. 23. Admit that Ken Jenne was involved in the decision to file the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 24. Admit that Michael Fisten was involved in the decision to file the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 25. Admit that in paragraph 9 of the Complaint (DE #1) in Case

to be filed a Complaint (DE #1) on behalf of M. in the case styled M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-81092 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division on July 24, 2009. A copy of the Complaint is attached as Exhibit A. 2. Admit that a Complaint (DE #1) was filed on beha