Epstein Secrets

parallel to the civil forfeiture proceeding. See State v. Lee, 245 P.3d 919, 923-24 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). 232 Haw. Rev. Stat. ANN. § 801D-4(a)(1) (LexisNexis 2007). 733 See id. 234 Id. § 801D-2. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014078 --- PAGE BREAK --- 100 CASSELL ET AL. [Vol. 104 Other states also expressly extend

re formal charges are filed. 27 Ariz. REV. STAT. ANN. § 13-4401(6) (2010) (emphasis added), see State ex rel. Thomas v. Klein, 150 P.3d 778, 780-81 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007) (noting the original version defined a criminal offense as a violation of a statute). °28 Under Arizona law, the “rights and duties that are e

nd sixth amendment Search Type: Terms and Connectors Narrowed by: Content Type Narrowed by Secondary Materials Sources: Law Reviews and Journals w LexisNexis® | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017603 --- PAGE BREAK --- CRI

ws by State, supra note 218. 27 Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-4401(6) (2010) (emphasis added); see State ex rel. Thomas v. Klein, 150 P.3d 778, 780-81 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007) (noting the original version defined a criminal offense as a violation of a statute). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017630 --- PAGE BREAK ---

d sixth amendment Search Type: Terms and Connectors Narrowed by: Content Type Narrowed by Secondary Materials Sources: Law Reviews and Journals w LexisNexis® | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017714 --- PAGE BREAK --- ART

ses, and the prompt administration of justice. [*879] The Rationale: 191 See, e.g., State ex rel. Romley v. Superior Courts, 836 P.2d 445, 451-52 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992) (crime victim had the right to deny defendant access to medical records); Commonwealth v. Wilson, 602 A.2d 1290, 1296-97 (Pa. 1992). See genera