Epstein Secrets

n. § 726.105(1)(a). Jane Doe has made such a showing, as explained in the next paragraph in text. 5 For this reason, Epstein’s citation of In re Stewart, 280 B.R. 268, 285 (Bkrtcy. M.D. Fla. 2001), is not on point. In that case, the plaintiff had merely made allegations without providing any support

solely upon a privileged refusal to admit or deny at the pleading stage.” Epstein Memo. in Opp. [DE 198 at 10] (quoting LaSalle Bank Lake View v. Seguban, 54 F.3d 387, 391 (7th Cir. 1995) (emphasis added)). As just Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2009 Page 15 of

tor is fraudulently transferring assets. Jane Doe fails to point to one iota of evidence that Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets. In In re Stewart, 280 B.R. 268 (M.D. Fla. 2001), proceedings were brought to set aside certain transfers of the debtor as fraudulent to creditors. The bankruptcy tr

ng the relief sought by Jane Doe based solely on an adverse inference would violate Epstein's Fifth Amendment rights. See LaSalle Bank Lake View v. Seguban, 54 F.3d 387, 389 (7th Cir. 1995) (noting that "the Supreme Court has prohibited practices that are coercive in that they make the exercise of the p

tor is fraudulently transferring assets. Jane Doe fails to point to one iota of evidence that Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets. In In re Stewart 280 B.R. 268 (M.D. Fla. 2001), proceedings were brought to set aside certain transfers of the debtor as fraudulent to creditors. The bankruptcy trus

nting the relief sought by Jane Doc based solely on an adverse inference would violate Epstein's Fifth Amendment rights. LaSalle Bank Lake View v. Seguban, 54 F.3d 387, 389 (7th Cir. 1995) (noting that "the Supreme Court has prohibited practices that are coercive in that they make the exercise of the p