Epstein Secrets

reasonably related to the original grand jury matter, will be handled by the district judge before whom the original matter was filed." Since Judge Middlebrooks issued the Order granting the government limited authority to disclose grand jury material, any issue regarding the scope of the Order should be ad

MEM Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. on au er a e, on a Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney Co

policy, and/or a violation of First Amendment principles. Our filing the entire reply under seal is based upon the November 7, 2011 Order from Judge Middlebrooks, permitting the government to make limited disclosure of Grand Jury matter. Judge Middlebrooks permitted disclosure under three conditions, includi

need to obtain additional authorization from the Court under Fed.R.Cr.P. 6(e) to disclose the information supporting jurisdiction and venue in the Southern District of New York and the District of New Jersey. When you refer to "unsealing of all information," if you mean that such information would be publicly di

policy, and/or a violation of First Amendment principles. Our filing the entire reply under seal is based upon the November 7, 2011 Order from Judge Middlebrooks, permitting the government to make limited disclosure of Grand Jury matter. Judge Middlebrooks permitted disclosure under three conditions, includi

need to obtain additional authorization from the Court under Fed.R.Cr.P. 6(e) to disclose the information supporting jurisdiction and venue in the Southern District of New York and the District of New Jersey. When you refer to "unsealing of all information," if you mean that such information would be publicly di

n and should nonetheless redact it from the order? I did not do that in the proposed redacted order that I sent you to accompany the motion to Judge Middlebrooks. EFTA00209347 My thought is to prepare one notice of filing to which the 6 separate redacted filings are attached. I'll put one together after lu

g the few non-responsive items and marking for attorney-client privilege and 6(e). Any other privileges I should consider? Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Wednesda Jul 03 2013 12:18 PM Su ject: : ane oes Unite Cate

f subject matter jurisdiction. It looks good except that the attached Judge Middlebrooks Order has more redactions than the one that I gave to Judge Middlebrooks yesterday. You just need to change that to correspond with what we gave him. I will keep reading and also look for the motions to seal. I think I h

t to correspond with what we gave him. I will keep reading and also look for the motions to seal. I think I have them all. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda Jul 03 2013 10:30 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Does United States - Redacted Pleadings A

u need? Something unsealed? Sent from my iPhone On May 26, 2017, at 4:02 PM, wrote: Hi Brad — We need to get something unsealed and neither Judge Middlebrooks nor Judge Marra's CRD's seem to be around. Can we agree to an extension until Tuesday? Judge Marra never entered the new scheduling order, so I thi

duling order, so I think we can just agree amongst ourselves, if it is okay with you. I am at my desk if you want to talk. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida EFTA00211698

rida in 1907 to provide legal immunity for actions that occur in judicial proceedings. Myers v. Hodges, 53 Fla. 197, 44 So. 357 (1907). In Levitt, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla.I994), the Florida Supreme Court extended the litigation pri

y litigation ultimately was settled. Ferrell, who was dissatisfied with the outcome, sued his partners in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ("the Federal case"). Ferrell's New York counsel retained the appellees, two Miami attorneys and their law firm (the "Miami Lawyers"), t

order or motion to quash, you will have time to prepare and file that motion. In case you decide to file such a motion, United States District Judge Middlebrooks is assigned to handle EFTA00179238 ROBERT L TARO, ESQ. JUNE 6, 2007 PAGE 2 OF 2 matters related to the relevant grand jury. Pursuant to Fed. R.

to pay such costs (28 USC 1825, Rule 17(b) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure)" EFTA00179237 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 VIA FACSIMILE Robert I. Targ, Esq. Din Reus Rolff & Targ LLP 100 S.E.

rder or motion to quash, you will have time to prepare and file that motion. In case you decide to file such a motion, United States District Judge Middlebrooks is assigned to handle matters related to the relevant grand jury. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(6), any such motion must be filed under seal.

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: June 6, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE Robert I. Targ, Esq. Diaz Reus

s. To avoid contravening the Orders of this Court and Judge Middlebrooks' Order, Respondent has determined that it must seek permission from Judge Middlebrooks to unseal or partially unseal his Order. 3. An additional seven (7) days is requested to prepare and receive a ruling on that motion. This request

sistant United States Attorney SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Flori