Epstein Secrets

ce Fisher, Assistant Attorney General. (See Ex. B.) I then applied to the Court for an Order compelling Jane Doe 2's testimony. U.S. District Judge Middlebrooks granted the application on April 16, 2007. (Ex. 6.) 12. After learning of Judge Middlebrooks' Order, Mr. Eisenberg asked whether Jane Doe 2 could

so contained my direct dial telephone number, the direct dial telephone number of the case agent, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, and the telephone number for the Justice Department's Office for Victims of Crime. (Id.). Both Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 also received letters from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, which were sent o

ocket 06/02/2017 Page 25 of 176 Exhibit 1 EFTA00799629 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 26 of 176 U.S. Department of Justice United Slates Attorney Southern District of FlOrida DELIVERY BY BAND James L. Bamberg, Esq. 250 S Australian Ave, Ste104 West Palm Beach, FL 33

Exhibit 1 at P-003714 thru P- 003721. 11. On April 16, 2007, the Court granted the government's Sealed Motion in a Sealed Order. Exhibit 3. Judge Middlebrooks was the judge who empaneled Federal Grand Jury 07-103. The Sealed Order states, in part, that the "Order shall be SEALED in accordance with Fed. R.

RANSMISSION OK TX/RX. NO 2683 CONNECTION TEL 6592380 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID ST. TIME 09/06 14:62 USAGE T 01'00 PGS. SENT 2 RESULT OK U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Facsimile . FACSIMILE CO

counsel upon lift of stay by 11d' Circuit Box #2 P-008364 Thru P-008382 File folder entitled Immunity Request" containing internal memoranda, Justice Department documentation, and subpoena regarding immunity request 6(e) Work Product Deliberative Process Investigative privilege Box #2 P-008383 Thru P

order or motion to quash, you will have time to prepare and file that motion. In case you decide to file such a motion, United States District Judge Middlebrooks is assigned to handle EFTA00179238 ROBERT L TARO, ESQ. JUNE 6, 2007 PAGE 2 OF 2 matters related to the relevant grand jury. Pursuant to Fed. R.

gent parties and criminal defendants who are unable to pay such costs (28 USC 1825, Rule 17(b) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure)" EFTA00179237 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 VIA FACSIMILE Robert I. Targ

rder or motion to quash, you will have time to prepare and file that motion. In case you decide to file such a motion, United States District Judge Middlebrooks is assigned to handle matters related to the relevant grand jury. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(6), any such motion must be filed under seal.

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: June 6, 2007 VIA

ematis Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Grand Jury 07-103(WPB), Disclosure of Grand Jury Material In Re: Operation Leap Year Dear Judge Middlebrooks: This office wishes to report to the court, consistent with Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(B), the disclosure to government personnel of grand jury mater

Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL 33401-6235 Tel: Fax: • R noi applicable, enter "none." To be mai inialorAON0 FORM ORD.227 JAN.86 EFTA00178592 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 8. Australian Ave.. Suite 100 West Pain, Beach. FL 33401-6235 (561) 820-8711 APPEARANCE

E.W. and a federal court action on behalf of Jane Doe. All of the cases were filed in the summer of 2008, 3. My clients received correspondence from the U.S. Department of Justice regarding their rights as victims of Epstein’s federal sex offenses. (True and accurate copies of the letters are attached to Statement of Undisputed

or other tortious behavior, suéh as tortious interference with business relationship, so long as act has some relationship to proceeding, See Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So, 2d 606 (Fla. 1994). The immunity afforded to statements made during the course