Epstein Secrets

9 by CM/ECF.[2521601] [18-2868] Limited Intervenor to Proceed Under Pseudonym (2) EFTA00792252 Case 18-2868, Document 150, 03/19/2019, 2521592, Pagel of 1 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL Short Title: v. Maxwell Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel's Conta

w York, New York 10110 Tel.: (212) 390-9550 Attorneys for Amicus Curiae John Doe EFTA00792257 Case 18-2868, Document 153-1, 03/19/2019, 2521600, Page3 of 6 --against--- SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, Intervenors-Appellants. EFTA00792258

iled ex parte with Court, under seal, for in camera review Form T-I0/10(rev.I2-I3) EFTA00792254 Case 18-2868, Document 152, 03/19/2019, 2521599, Pagel of 1 UNITED snits COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212.857.

19 Service by. EICMECF DOther [Attach proof of senicej Form T-1080 (rev.12-13) EFTA00792256 Case 18-2868. Document 153-1, 03/19/2019. 2521600, Paget of 6 18-2868 IN THE Zfriniteb tecto Court of Appeat FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT -0181.111. L. ---against--- GHISLAME MAXWELL, (Caption continued

tributed money that was intended for the preparation or submission of this brief. EFTA00792259 Case 18-2868. Document 153-1, 03/19/2019. 2521600, Page5 of 6 The proposed brief supports the objections of Maxwell insofar as she objects to the unsealing of the Summary Judgment Materials until appropri

7 Gardner v. Newsday, Inc., 895 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1990) 5 In re New York Times Co., 828 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1987) 4, 5, 8 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) 4 Miller v. City of Ithaca, No. 10 Civ. 597 (TJM), 2013 WL 12310711 (N.D.N.Y. May 8, 2013) 6 Nixon v. Warner Commc

Case 18-2868, Document 141, 03/15/2019, 2519388, Pagel of 27 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-85

rials, and (2) to hold in abeyance the Orders until the disposition of this Motion. EFTA00791870 Case 18-2868, Document 141, 03/15/2019, 2519388, Page3 of 27 Introduction The panel's Order to Show Cause and March 13 Order directing the appellees to produce the sealed and redacted summary judgment

e sealed and redacted information, not only will she be able to continue pursuing 3 EFTA00791872 Case 18-2868, Document 141, 03/15/2019, 2519388, Page5 of 27 publicity for profit, but also she will be able to engage in the prurient trafficking of others' private, personal and confidential informati

, the panel has the authority to direct the district court to act promptly—as it did in Lugoschi —on the unseal motions. `Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). 4 EFTA00791873 Case 18-2868, Document 141, 03/15/2019, 2519388, Page6 of 27 Factual Background Two related appeal

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARO

oy v. North, 692 F.2d 880 (2d Cir. 1982) 22 Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2012) 34 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) 19, 21 Maldanado v. City of New York, Case No. 17-cv-6618 (AJN), 2018 WL 2561026 (S.D.N.Y. June 1, 2018) 35 Martin