5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can
of Susan Pope and Dr. Serge and Incorporated Memorandum of Law and has advised the undersigned that he objects to the relief requested herein. /s/ Jack P. Hill 8 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 245 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2009 Page 9 of 50 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 4
doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46. 78 S.Ct. 99, 102. 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can
January, 2009: Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. th Lake Worth, FL 33461 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Search Denney Scarola Shipley, P.A. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Counsel
/2009 EFTA00182798 Page 7 of 11 162 F.3d 832 162 F.3d 832 (Cite as: 162 F.3d 832) ate standard of review is clear error. See Linked States v. Gibson, 48 F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir.1995); Balls, 28 F.3d at 1409. We agree that this is the appropriate stand- ard for reviewing a district court's finding
Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe 08- Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 ch, FL 33401 Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Scatty Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Counsel for Plaintiff, Counsel f
doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can
Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss P.A. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 ounse or a en an s Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Bruce E. Reinhart. P.A. Shiolev, P A West Palm beach, FL 33401 vvest rain tseacn
doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can
ichard H Willits PA 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth , FL 33461 Fax: Emai : ree r otmail.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jack Patrick Hill Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard PO Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach , FL 33402-3626 PIM Email: represented
Entities connected to both Gibson and Jack Patrick Hill

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONRichard Horace Willits
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONIsidro Manuel Garcia
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSONKatherine W. Ezell
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSONBruce E. Reinhart
PERSON
Lake Worth
LOCATIONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSON
Salt Lake City
LOCATIONSouthern District
LOCATIONScott Rothstein
PERSON