Epstein Secrets

8-cv-80893-KAM Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 03'03'2010 Page 10 of 10 (c) The remainder of Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3id day of March, 2010. te r "- KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: A

ourt have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 583 (1981); Gross v. State, 765 So.2d 39, 43 (Fla. 2000) (adopting Turkette as a matter of Florida RICO law). "The distinction betwe

8-cv-80893-KAM Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2010 Page 10 of 10 (c) The remainder of Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3s day of March, 2010. / KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: All coun

ourt have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 583 (1981); Gross v. State, 765 So.2d 39, 43 (Fla. 2000) (adopting Turkette as a matter of Florida RICO law). "The distinction betwe

8-cv-80893-KAM Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2010 Page 10 of 10 (c) The remainder of Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3s day of March, 2010. / KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: All coun

ourt have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 583 (1981); Gross v. State, 765 So.2d 39, 43 (Fla. 2000) (adopting Turkette as a matter of Florida RICO law). "The distinction betwe