Epstein Secrets

then later offering Epstein the option of not having to provide the attorney-representative for the victims; (15) refusing to allow the agents and Ito notify the victims about the terms of the NPA and about the change of plea; (16) allowing Epstein to continue to enjoy the benefits of the NPA even

her in touch with his attorney, Jack Goldberger; and Goldberger had his friend, Jim Eisenberg, serve as Individual #28's lawyer while Epstein paid Eisenberg's fees. Individual #28 later told Brad Edwards that someone (Epstein, Goldberger, or Eisenberg) told her that "the government" planned to take away

•• A41 7 901I Ammo ttttt c Orwrioinanoti l/ador Ito& A cams iv how , 950 Coommoimelity *rum Tou us

they were fifteen years old. 2.the undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -2- EFTA00190507 S. In the summer of 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("the Office") decid

G 0 nhcem Date Description Attorney Produce/Ito Wens* I 3501.100 031 2007.0815 Law enforcemmt

501.149.02g 2007.09.07 National comprehensive report for 3501.14%029 2007.09.07 Record search regardec 3501.149.030 2018.01.10 Fill letter to James Eisenberg 3501.149031 2006.02.25 Palm Beach Pak* Department intelligence moon 3501.149032 2006.03.18 Testimony of 3501.149.033 2008.03.24 Victim let

3.401-5007 Dear Jim; 500 South Attain/too Ave, &Ito 400 act Pa& :Beach, FL 334W (50)1120-871 Amnio

that he 3 EFTA00799608 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 5 of 176 was representing Jane Doe 2. Mr. Eisenberg also informed me that Jane Doe 2 would not provide testimony or appear for a consensual interview unless the U.S. Attorney's Office obtained court-

hie letter. Please remember, your oartkapabon In Ito nelftabon pond/4s porn voluntary. In ardor to co

would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. 09112/2019 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00331560 EFTA_00204286 EFTA02729277 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM

d Alit° Didn't you say that/ h. Ilea to ay tages1•494 or reoelleetion. t have never said astride; Ilia that. O. That would have bum a eemplote Ito, wouldn't it have Wesel F,,. In= — — 1656 NM Oath Me had, sae - West Palm OsC3JUH11--.- tOnsor & Associates Pagel 74 Corneal. I do at know h

outhern District of Florida DELIVERY BY HAND James L. Eisenberg, Esq. 250 S Australian Ave, Ste 704 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5007 Re: Dear Mr. Eisenberg: 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: February 5, 2007 I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the int

then later offering Epstein the option of not having to provide the attorney-representative for the victims; (15) refusing to allow the agents and Ito notify the victims about the terms of the NPA and about the change of plea; (16) allowing Epstein to continue to enjoy the benefits of the NPA even

contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe I United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for by Mr. Epstein. I told Mr. Eisenberg that I was preparing victim notification letters and needed to know if he was still representing