Epstein Secrets

got attached to this conversation and rather certain that my comments will be unwelcome, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws

rs (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar EFTA00710456 —Original Message— From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

attached to this conversation and I'm rather certain that my comments will be unwelcome, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the law

enerates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar Original Message From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: (Sadhu Sanga) Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

ached to this conversation and I'm rather certain that my comments will be unwelcome, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. < That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the law

enerates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar —Original Message-- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

rence called Sages and Scientists annually , but it's not at the level you're thinking . I have invited skeptics and academics including Krauss and Dawkins and Cox etc . They have never accepted . We lose money so this may be the last year . Can we think about this with a tantalizing title Perhaps in

s (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar EFTA00821671 —Original Message-- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 : pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are re

attached to this conversation and I'm rather certain that my comments will be unwelcome, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws

rates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar Original Message---- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric < To: online_sadhu_sanga < Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we

attached to this conversation and I'm rather certain that my comments will be unwelcome, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws

erates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar Original Message--- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are relying on conscio

attached to this conversation and I'm rather certain that my comments will be unwelcome, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws

enerates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar Original Message From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

s conversation and I'm rather certain that my comments will be unwelcome, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. EFTA00821891 That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the law

erates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar ----Original Message From: Dr. Mike Sosteric < To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 1fliaMM Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga) Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we ar