Epstein Secrets

got attached to this conversation and rather certain that my comments will be unwelcome, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws

law then Einstein was right. If there is no flaw in this logic then General Relativity is nonsense. Kind regards Brad On 8 Aug 2016 11:34 "ICari Ross-Berry" < wrote: A little Classical Samkhya, one of the six Hindu Darsanas, might be helpful here in bringing spiritual and scientific knowledge into a b

ached to this conversation and I'm rather certain that my comments will be unwelcome, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. < That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the law

hen Einstein was right. If there is no flaw in this logic then General Relativity is nonsense. Kind regards Brad On 8 Aug 2016 11:34 p.m., "ICari Ross-Berry" < wrote: A little Classical Samkhya, one of the six Hindu Darsanas, might be helpful here in bringing spiritual and scientific knowledge into a b

rence called Sages and Scientists annually , but it's not at the level you're thinking . I have invited skeptics and academics including Krauss and Dawkins and Cox etc . They have never accepted . We lose money so this may be the last year . Can we think about this with a tantalizing title Perhaps in

hen Einstein was right. If there is no flaw in this logic then General Relativity is nonsense. Kind regards Brad On 8 Aug 2016 11:34 p.m., "ICari Ross-Berry" < wrote: A little Classical Samkhya, one of the six Hindu Darsanas, might be helpful here in bringing spiritual and scientific knowledge into a b