Epstein Secrets

ot Consummated Appealed 120 month sentence. Showed up for meeting Affirmed. 54 EFTA00224188 COURT CASES FACILITY FACfS/COMMUNICATrIn U.S I Grossman, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12500 (11" Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet chat room "preteen, baby and toddler sex"; initiated communications

FAITH A. FRIEDMAN ffriedinarylletcouttlaNcom BY HAND Matthew Menchel, Esq. Chief of the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 41' Street Miami, Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Menchel: July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein TELEPHONE '212)737-0400 FACSIMILE 12i P) 9/

nce. Showed up for meeting Affirmed. 52 EFTA01729536 COURT : . . . CASES - . ti80.00Y ..;c `.F,AACT'S/CoMMUNIGATION • : :CHARGE U.S. v. Grossman, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12500 (11th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet chat room "preteen, baby and toddler sex"; initiated communications

dditional details recently located. EFTA01729480 LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEPCOURT. PC. Chief of Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 25, 2007 Page 2 • For example, of the 184 prosecutions in which at least one count alleges a violation of §2422(b), in the overw

Appealed 120 month sentence. Showed up for meeting Affirmed. 52 EFTA00079465 O ia riolafi t. FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION Cl LARGE U.S. v. Grossman, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12500 (11th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet chat room "preteen, baby and toddler sex"; initiated communications

H riBlialloROWEWN:orn RENATO C. STABILE altRINBIeBoustar tom rainy BY HAND Chief of the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Dear• Mr. Menthe': July 25, 2007 Jeffiry Epstein TELEPHONE la 1E)7370400 m ailman We have pr

ormed before and was existing j at the time of the commies' of the overt act or acts. Dahly United States, 8 Cir., 60 F.2d 8 United States v. Grossman, D.C, 55 F.2d 408. There must be proof of the unlawful agreement, either expressed or implied, in and participation with owledge of the agreeme

nds which were Issued by American corporation in England and which were designated as gold coupon bonds. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, John M. Caehin, J., 140 F.Supp. 82, rendered judgment declaring that they were payable in current British tender; the bondholder app