Epstein Secrets

ve., Ste. 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Barbara Burns, Esq., State Attorney's Office - West Palm Beach

rial; and 3. closure would be effective in protecting the rights of the accused, without being broader than necessary to accomplish this purpose. Miami Herald Publ'a Co. v. Lewis, 426 So. 2d 1, 6 (Fla. 1982). This test, as well as the standard announced in Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. 531 So. 2d 113 (F

ue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Barbara Burns, Esq., State Attorney's Office 401 North Dixie H

records. See Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So. 2d 113, 118 (Fla. 1988) (news media have standing to challenge any closure order); Miami Herald Publ'a Co. v. Lewis, 426 So. 2d I, 7 (Fla. 1982) (news media must be given an opportunity to be heard on question of closure). 09/12/2019 P CONFIDENTIAL Age

774 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 149 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 10 of 13 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 10 usually be irrelevant. Cf. Burns v. McGregor Electronic Industries, Inc., 989 F.2d 959, 962-63 (8th Cir. 1993) (posing for a nude magazine outside work hours is irrelevant to issue

records. See Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc., 531 So. 2d 113, 118 (Fla. 1988) (news media have standing to challenge any closure order); Miami Herald Publ'a Co. v. Lewis 426 So. 2d I, 7 (Fla. 1982) (news media must be given an opportunity to be heard on question of closure). EFTA00182785 08/05/2009 10:01