Epstein Secrets

id not receive any victim calls during this time. I did receive communications from two attorneys. In March 2008, I received I letter from attorney Richard Willits, advising me that he represented Individual #3 and that he had filed suit on her behalf against Epstein in Palm Beach County Circuit Court (Exhibit

email from Jeff that said, "Hold the letter" (Exhibit B-54). On December 10, 2007, I contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe'. United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for by Mr. Epstein. I told Mr. Eisenberg that I was

ad been identified in the state investigation), alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The suit, which is still pending, is captioned Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 21 United States, 08-80736-CV-KAM. Page 3 of 58 EFTA00225046 set aside the NPA and see Mr. Epstein federally charged due to violatio

6 criminal prosecution. 7 MR. JOSEFSBERG: I agree, Your Honor. 8 THE COURT: Any other plaintiff's counsel want to 9 chime in? 10 MR. WILLITS: Richard Willits on behalf of 11 would join, to weigh in on what Mr. Josefsberg said. 12 MR. JOSEFSBERG: Your Honor, I could not hear. 13 THE COURT: We'll get hi

s Doe vs. Epstein 2 cases. 3 May I have counsel state their appearances? 4 MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs 5 Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. 6 THE COURT: Good morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good mo

Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs 5 Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. 6 THE COURT: Good morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE COURT: Good morning. 13 MR. WILLI

t C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.08-80591 Richard Willits, Esq. Michael Danchuk, Esq. [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811

LORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPS

81, 08-80993, 08-80994 Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq. Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq. Leopold Kuvin. P.A Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804 Richard Willits, Esq. Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 Brad Edwards, Esq. Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC Counsel for Plaintiff in

0722215 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 3 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. II, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469- MARRA/JOHNSON Plainti

re: scheduling depositions; calls from Mermelsteln; receipt of fax from Mermelsteln; call from 1.90 hr $237.50 Edwards; calls from Jack Hill and Richard Willits; coordinate dates of availability; conference with RDC; send letters with return envelopes to Judges 03/16/2009 MJP Research and analysis of law

ncorporate specific factual allegations from 2nd Amended Complaint 1.20 hr $360.00 03/25/2009 RHB Conference with paralegal regarding filing of Jane Doe's 2-5 Responses to 0.10 hr $30.00 Motions to Compel 03/25/2009 RHB Review Jane Doe's 2-7 2nd Amended Complaints for viable c/a, Count III 0.75 hr

15 be — 16 Would the attorneys please announce their 16 A. No. No. No. No. No. 17 appearances for the record. 17 Q. Okay. 18 MR. WILLITS: Richard Willits. representing 18 A. '99. 19 19 Q. 1999? 20 MR. BERGER: WilliamJ. Berger. representing 20 A. Yeah. 21 ...mg and Jane Doe number two. 21

e time is 12 minutes after 10:00 in the morning. 8 trying -- 9 This is the videotaped deposition of Juan 9 Q. Sure. 10 Alessi in the matter of Jane Doe number two versus 10 A. -- to remember. 1969 as a part-time 11 Jeffrey Epstein. This deposition is being held at 11 maintenance guy. 12 2139

Kuvin, Esq. Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq. Leo old Kuvin P.A. Palm Beach Gardens FL 33410 Phone: Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804 Richard Willits, Esq. Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Fort Lauderdale FL 33301-4252 Phone Coun

08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-C V-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, -2- Podhurst °neck, P.A. FOni"difda l EFTA00599360 Defendant. JANE DOE

Joint-privilege 01716 09/15/2009 Adam Horowitz Elizabeth Villar Epstein: Forensics/Investigations INVOICE Joint-privilege 01768 07/13/2009 Richard Willits Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Investigator Joint-privilege 01771.01772 08/06/2009 Adam Horowitz Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Investigator Joint-pr

97 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06901 09/11/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada Re:Jane Doe No. 101 & Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Epstein-Cross Notice Of Depos Joint W/P Priv. 06902 09/15/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada RE: Jane Doe N

Joint-privilege 01716 09/15/2009 Adam Horowitz Elizabeth Villar Epstein: Forensics/Investigations INVOICE Joint-privilege 01768 07/13/2009 Richard Willits Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Investigator Joint-privilege 01771-01772 08/06/2009 Adam Horowitz Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Investigator Joint-pr

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 01080-01081 06/22/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe brother Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 01077 05/28/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Doe family member Attorney/Client p

6 criminal prosecution. 7 MR. JOSEFSBERG: I agree, Your Honor. 8 THE COURT: Any other plaintiff's counsel want to 9 chime in? 10 MR. WILLITS: Richard Willits on behalf of C.M.A.. I 11 would join, to weigh in on what Mr. Josefsberg said. 12 MR. JOSEFSBERG: Your Honor, I could not hear. 13 THE COURT: We

se he's an awesome guy and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing." 6. Other than these events, neither I nor any other FBI agent had any contact with Jane Doe #2 during the course of the investigation. Jane Doe #2 never contacted me or my co-case agents asking for information about the investigation or ask