Epstein Secrets

s, LLC 2028 Harrison Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 (954)414-8033 Fax: (954) 924-1530 Attorney for Plaintiffs [Service via CM/ECF] Jay C. Howell Jay Howell & Associates PA 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville , FL 32211 Email: [email protected] PRO HAC VICE [Service via CM/ECF]

In October 2007, shortly after the agreement was signed, four victims were contacted and these provisions were discussed. One of those victims was C.W. who at the time was not represented, and she was given notice of the agreement. Notice was also provided of an expected change of plea in October 2

ess Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your A Mantis letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).

a draft stipulation to Brad Edwards last Wednesday. Edwards responded by letter dated July 17, 2008, which is attached. He has enlisted the aid of Jay Howell, who is a victim rights advocate, and Professor Paul Cassell, former U.S. District Judge, who Is now a law professor with a strong interest in vict

regard to C.W., FBI Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richardson met with her in September 2007 to advise her of the agreement reached in state court. C.W. claims she understood them to mean the federal proceeding was still a possibility. I think we have little to gain by trying to reach an agreement o

n evidentiary hearing is necessary. We don't dispute that none of the victims were notified of the impending agreement with Epstein. With regard to C.W., FBI Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richardson met with her in September 2007 to advise her of the agreement reached in state court. C.W. claims she

e 5 of 7 Ns, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 08-80736 In re: Jane Doe, et at Petitioners. CERTIFICATION OF JAY C. HOWELL Jay C. Howell, pursuant to Rule 4B of the Special Rules Governing the Admission and Practice of Attorneys, hereby certifies that (I) I have studied

1/2008) 08/08/2008 20 MOTION for Limited Appearance, Consent to Designation and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jay C. Howell, Filing Fee $75, Receipt #724591. (cw) (Entered: 08/12/2008) 08/13/2008 21 ENDORSED ORDER granting Jay C. Howell 20 Motion for Limited Appearance

r victims [including C.W.] were contacted and these provisions were discussed" (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement ....." (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted a

sets a precedent unrivaled in other federal circuits. "So much of the legal area of victims' rights is breaking new ground and new territory," said Jay Howell, a Jacksonville appellate lawyer who represented the women. "The court decision here expands the rights of the victims and the victims' ability to d

eference to the ages of the minor victims and, upon conviction, did not require sex offender registration. 3. Jane Doe #1 is a woman with initials C.W., and Jane Doe #2 is a woman with initials T.M. Both were victims of Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. Bo