Epstein Secrets

oth unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsibleaseribe blame to Mr. Epstein never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tunc order. June 15 Letter at 3. Frankly, I am confused as to how you could do so. Neither Mr. Epstein ,nor defense counsel had anything

cial Master be empowered to resolve any issues that Mr- -Jesefsber-ghe and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the unusual-isseesattorney representative -that have-s

ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior

d to resolve any fee related issues that the Podhurst firm and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See Exhibit 20, June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the attorney representative that even begins to approac

ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior

d to resolve any fee related issues that the Podhurst firm and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See Exhibit 20, June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the attorney representative that even begins to approac

provide certified copies of same to the officer for use in compliance with the requirements of law. DONE AND ORDERED, on NUNC PRO TUNC 06-30-2008 Sandra K. McSorley, Circuit dge I ac ow ge receipt of a copy of this order and that the conditions have plained to me and I agree by them. ep/07-02-08 Defendant

Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) EFTA00182053 • Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 305-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 PRttlacif of 2 Robert D. Critton Jr. From: Adam Horowitz Sent Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:43 AM To: Michael J. Pike; Robert D. Critton Jr. Cc: Stuart Mermelstein Subject Jane

provide certified copies of same to the officer for use in compliance with the requirements of law. DONE AND ORDERED, on NUNC PRO TUNC 06-30-2008 Sandra K. McSorley, Circuit dge I ac ow ge receipt of a copy of this order and that the conditions have plained to me and I agree by them. ep/07-02-08 Defendant

-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) EFTA01625684 • Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 305-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 PR4121acif ?If 2 Robert D. Critton Jr. From: Adam Horowitz tahorowitz(sexabuseettomey.corn) Sent Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:43 AM To: Michael J. Pike; Robert D. Critton Jr. Cc: